From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: s390: Improve floating IRQ injection behavior
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:24:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43f7856a-dd03-407e-b8d8-a5534a9f10ca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819191317.2C7961F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>
On 8/19/26 9:13 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] Incorrect bitmask computation for floating I/O interrupts causes thundering herd performance regressions or lost wakeups.
> --
>
> --- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: s390: Improve floating IRQ injection behavior ---
> commit 8a0b82ce7a926dc2db73a2448ac2bcc105213707
> Author: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>
> KVM: s390: Improve floating IRQ injection behavior
>
> This commit improves floating IRQ injection by checking if a VCPU has pending
> IRQs instead of blindly waking up the last VCPU that went to sleep. This aims
> to prevent deadlocks when a VCPU is sleeping without an open mask.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> index 8f24bcd1a6d36..3af060ec5be8e 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -1915,49 +1915,93 @@ static int __inject_io(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info *inti)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static u64 inti_to_irq_pend_mask(u64 type, int isc)
>> +{
>> + switch (type) {
>> + case KVM_S390_MCHK:
>> + /* Only repressible machine checks are floating */
>> + return BIT(IRQ_PEND_MCHK_REP);
>> + case KVM_S390_INT_VIRTIO:
>> + return BIT(IRQ_PEND_VIRTIO);
>> + case KVM_S390_INT_SERVICE:
>> + return BIT(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE) |
>> + BIT(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV);
>> + case KVM_S390_INT_PFAULT_DONE:
>> + return BIT(IRQ_PEND_PFAULT_DONE);
>> + case KVM_S390_INT_IO_MIN...KVM_S390_INT_IO_MAX:
>> + return isc_to_irq_type(isc);
>
> [Severity: High]
> Does this correctly return a bitmask? The other cases return BIT() masks, but
> this returns a raw integer resulting from isc_to_irq_type().
> >
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -1974,6 +2018,8 @@ static int __inject_vm(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info *inti)
>> rc = __inject_pfault_done(kvm, inti);
>> break;
>> case KVM_S390_INT_IO_MIN...KVM_S390_INT_IO_MAX:
>> + /* Grab isc here since __inject_io() might free inti */
>> + isc = isc_to_irq_type(int_word_to_isc(inti->io.io_int_word));
>
> [Severity: High]
> Are we applying isc_to_irq_type() twice for I/O interrupts?
>
> This converts the ISC to an IRQ bit index before assigning it to `isc`. Later,
> __floating_irq_kick() passes it to inti_to_irq_pend_mask(), which calls
> isc_to_irq_type() a second time on the same value.
>
> Since isc_to_irq_type() is implemented as `IRQ_PEND_IO_ISC_0 - isc`, calling it
> twice will reverse the calculation and yield the original ISC value instead
> of the expected IRQ bit index.
Rebase damage, will fix both.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 18:41 [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: s390: Improve floating IRQ injection behavior Janosch Frank
2026-08-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " Janosch Frank
2026-08-19 19:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 7:24 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2026-08-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] KVM: s390: Kick PV cpus at the right time for service irqs Janosch Frank
2026-08-19 19:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: s390: Add opportunistic floating IRQ injection Janosch Frank
2026-08-19 19:11 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43f7856a-dd03-407e-b8d8-a5534a9f10ca@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox