public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, drjones@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/7] s390x: virtio: CCW transport implementation
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:34:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <509a8f4f-89cc-fe80-4200-6776c503adbf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74901bd1-e69f-99d3-b11e-e0b541226d20@redhat.com>



On 11/3/21 08:49, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 27/08/2021 12.17, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> This is the implementation of the virtio-ccw transport level.
>>
>> We only support VIRTIO revision 0.
> 
> That means only legacy virtio? Wouldn't it be better to shoot for modern 
> virtio instead?

Yes but can we do it in a second series?
We will need more chqnges in the comon libraries.


> 
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 374 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   lib/s390x/virtio-ccw.h | 111 ++++++++++++
>>   lib/virtio-config.h    |  30 ++++
>>   s390x/Makefile         |   2 +
>>   4 files changed, 517 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 lib/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
>>   create mode 100644 lib/s390x/virtio-ccw.h
>>   create mode 100644 lib/virtio-config.h
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/lib/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..cf447de6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/*
>> + * Virtio CCW Library
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2021 IBM Corp
>> + *
>> + * Authors:
>> + *  Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> + *
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <libcflat.h>
>> +#include <alloc_page.h>
>> +#include <asm/page.h>
>> +#include <string.h>
>> +#include <interrupt.h>
>> +#include <asm/arch_def.h>
>> +#include <asm/facility.h>
>> +#include <asm/uv.h>
>> +
>> +#include <css.h>
>> +#include <virtio.h>
>> +#include <virtio-config.h>
>> +#include <virtio-ccw.h>
>> +#include <malloc_io.h>
>> +
>> +static struct linked_list vcdev_list = {
>> +    .prev = &vcdev_list,
>> +    .next = &vcdev_list
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline uint32_t swap16(uint32_t b)
>> +{
>> +        return (((b & 0xff00U) <<  8) |
>> +        ((b & 0x00ff) >>  8));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline uint32_t swap32(uint32_t b)
>> +{
>> +    return (((b & 0x000000ffU) << 24) |
>> +        ((b & 0x0000ff00U) <<  8) |
>> +        ((b & 0x00ff0000U) >>  8) |
>> +        ((b & 0xff000000U) >> 24));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline uint64_t swap64(uint64_t x)
>> +{
>> +    return (((x & 0x00000000000000ffULL) << 56) |
>> +        ((x & 0x000000000000ff00ULL) << 40) |
>> +        ((x & 0x0000000000ff0000ULL) << 24) |
>> +        ((x & 0x00000000ff000000ULL) <<  8) |
>> +        ((x & 0x000000ff00000000ULL) >>  8) |
>> +        ((x & 0x0000ff0000000000ULL) >> 24) |
>> +        ((x & 0x00ff000000000000ULL) >> 40) |
>> +        ((x & 0xff00000000000000ULL) >> 56));
>> +}
> 
> We already have macros for swapping in lib/asm-generic/io.h ... could 
> you use those instead?

Yes, I will.

> 
>> +/*
>> + * flags: flags for CCW
>> + * Returns !0 on failure
>> + * Returns 0 on success
>> + */
>> +int ccw_send(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev, int code, void *data, 
>> int count,
>> +         unsigned char flags)
>> +{
>> +    struct ccw1 *ccw;
>> +    int ret = -1;
>> +
>> +    ccw = alloc_io_mem(sizeof(*ccw), 0);
>> +    if (!ccw)
>> +        return ret;
>> +
>> +    /* Build the CCW chain with a single CCW */
>> +    ccw->code = code;
>> +    ccw->flags = flags;
>> +    ccw->count = count;
>> +    ccw->data_address = (unsigned long)data;
>> +
>> +    ret = start_ccw1_chain(vcdev->schid, ccw);
>> +    if (!ret)
>> +        ret = wait_and_check_io_completion(vcdev->schid);
>> +
>> +    free_io_mem(ccw, sizeof(*ccw));
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int virtio_ccw_set_revision(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
>> +{
>> +    struct virtio_rev_info *rev_info;
>> +    int ret = -1;
>> +
>> +    rev_info = alloc_io_mem(sizeof(*rev_info), 0);
>> +    if (!rev_info)
>> +        return ret;
>> +
>> +    rev_info->revision = VIRTIO_CCW_REV_MAX;
>> +    rev_info->revision = 0;
> 
> Either VIRTIO_CCW_REV_MAX or 0, but not both?

:D
Seems the second line has been forgotten.


> 
>> +    do {
>> +        ret = ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_SET_VIRTIO_REV, rev_info,
>> +                   sizeof(*rev_info), 0);
>> +    } while (ret && rev_info->revision--);
>> +
>> +    free_io_mem(rev_info, sizeof(*rev_info));
>> +
>> +    return ret ? -1 : rev_info->revision;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int virtio_ccw_reset(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
>> +{
>> +    return ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_VDEV_RESET, 0, 0, 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int virtio_ccw_read_status(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
>> +{
>> +    return ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_READ_STATUS, &vcdev->status,
>> +            sizeof(vcdev->status), 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int virtio_ccw_write_status(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
>> +{
>> +    return ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_WRITE_STATUS, &vcdev->status,
>> +            sizeof(vcdev->status), 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int virtio_ccw_read_features(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev, 
>> uint64_t *features)
>> +{
>> +    struct virtio_feature_desc *f_desc = &vcdev->f_desc;
>> +
>> +    f_desc->index = 0;
>> +    if (ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_READ_FEAT, f_desc, sizeof(*f_desc), 0))
>> +        return -1;
>> +    *features = swap32(f_desc->features);
>> +
>> +    f_desc->index = 1;
>> +    if (ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_READ_FEAT, f_desc, sizeof(*f_desc), 0))
>> +        return -1;
>> +    *features |= (uint64_t)swap32(f_desc->features) << 32;
> 
> Weren't the upper feature bits only available for modern virtio anyway?

Yes.
I have the intention to upgrade to Rev. 1 when I get enough time for it.
Should I remove this? It does not induce problem does it?

> 
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int virtio_ccw_write_features(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev, 
>> uint64_t features)
>> +{
>> +    struct virtio_feature_desc *f_desc = &vcdev->f_desc;
>> +
>> +    f_desc->index = 0;
>> +    f_desc->features = swap32((uint32_t)features & 0xffffffff);
>> +    if (ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_WRITE_FEAT, &f_desc, sizeof(*f_desc), 
>> 0))
>> +        return -1;
>> +
>> +    f_desc->index = 1;
>> +    f_desc->features = swap32((uint32_t)(features >> 32) & 0xffffffff);
>> +    if (ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_WRITE_FEAT, &f_desc, sizeof(*f_desc), 
>> 0))
>> +        return -1;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int virtio_ccw_read_config(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
>> +{
>> +    return ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_READ_CONF, &vcdev->config,
>> +            sizeof(vcdev->config), 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int virtio_ccw_write_config(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
>> +{
>> +    return ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_WRITE_CONF, &vcdev->config,
>> +            sizeof(vcdev->config), 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int virtio_ccw_setup_indicators(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
>> +{
>> +    vcdev->ind = alloc_io_mem(sizeof(PAGE_SIZE), 0);
>> +    if (ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_SET_IND, &vcdev->ind,
>> +             sizeof(vcdev->ind), 0))
>> +        return -1;
>> +
>> +    vcdev->conf_ind = alloc_io_mem(PAGE_SIZE, 0);
>> +    if (ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_SET_CONF_IND, &vcdev->conf_ind,
>> +             sizeof(vcdev->conf_ind), 0))
>> +        return -1;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static uint64_t virtio_ccw_notify_host(int schid, int queue, uint64_t 
>> cookie)
>> +{
>> +    register unsigned long nr asm("1") = 0x03;
>> +    register unsigned long s asm("2") = schid;
>> +    register unsigned long q asm("3") = queue;
>> +    register long rc asm("2");
> 
> Using asm("2") for two variables looks somewhat weird ... but ok, as 
> long as it works... (otherwise you could also use only one variable and 
> mark it as input + output parameter below).

OK

> 
>> +    register long c asm("4") = cookie;
>> +
>> +    asm volatile ("diag 2,4,0x500\n"
>> +            : "=d" (rc)
>> +            : "d" (nr), "d" (s), "d" (q), "d"(c)
>> +            : "memory", "cc");
>> +    return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool virtio_ccw_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
>> +{
>> +    struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vq->vdev);
>> +    struct virtio_ccw_vq_info *info = vq->priv;
>> +
>> +    info->cookie = virtio_ccw_notify_host(vcdev->schid, vq->index,
>> +                          info->cookie);
>> +    if (info->cookie < 0)
>> +        return false;
>> +    return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* allocates a vring_virtqueue but returns a pointer to the
>> + * virtqueue inside of it or NULL on error.
>> + */
>> +static struct virtqueue *setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, int index,
>> +                  void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *vq),
>> +                  const char *name)
>> +{
>> +    struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vdev);
>> +    struct virtio_ccw_vq_info *info;
>> +    struct vring_virtqueue *vq;
>> +    struct vring *vr;
>> +    void *queue;
>> +
>> +    vq = alloc_io_mem(sizeof(*vq), 0);
>> +    info = alloc_io_mem(sizeof(*info), 0);
>> +    queue = alloc_io_mem(4 * PAGE_SIZE, 0);
>> +    assert(vq && queue && info);
>> +
>> +    info->info_block = alloc_io_mem(sizeof(*info->info_block), 0);
>> +    assert(info->info_block);
>> +
>> +    vcdev->vq_conf.index = index;
>> +    if (ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_READ_VQ_CONF, &vcdev->vq_conf,
>> +             sizeof(vcdev->vq_conf), 0))
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    vring_init_virtqueue(vq, index, vcdev->vq_conf.max_num, 
>> PAGE_SIZE, vdev,
>> +                 queue, virtio_ccw_notify, callback, name);
>> +
>> +    vr = &vq->vring;
>> +    info->info_block->s.desc = vr->desc;
>> +    info->info_block->s.index = index;
>> +    info->info_block->s.num = vr->num;
>> +    info->info_block->s.avail = vr->avail;
>> +    info->info_block->s.used = vr->used;
>> +
>> +    info->info_block->l.desc = vr->desc;
>> +    info->info_block->l.index = index;
>> +    info->info_block->l.num = vr->num;
>> +    info->info_block->l.align = PAGE_SIZE;
>> +
>> +    if (ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_SET_VQ, info->info_block,
>> +             sizeof(info->info_block->l), 0))
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    info->vq = &vq->vq;
>> +    vq->vq.priv = info;
>> +
>> +    return &vq->vq;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int virtio_ccw_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned 
>> int nvqs,
>> +                   struct virtqueue *vqs[], vq_callback_t *callbacks[],
>> +                   const char *names[])
>> +{
>> +    int i;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < nvqs; ++i) {
>> +        vqs[i] = setup_vq(vdev, i,
>> +                  callbacks ? callbacks[i] : NULL,
>> +                  names ? names[i] : "");
>> +        if (!vqs[i])
>> +            return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void virtio_ccw_config_get(struct virtio_device *vdev,
>> +                  unsigned int offset, void *buf,
>> +                  unsigned int len)
>> +{
>> +    struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vdev);
>> +
>> +    if (virtio_ccw_read_config(vcdev))
>> +        return;
>> +    memcpy(buf, vcdev->config, len);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void virtio_ccw_config_set(struct virtio_device *vdev,
>> +                  unsigned int offset, const void *buf,
>> +                  unsigned int len)
>> +{
>> +    struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vdev);
>> +
>> +    memcpy(vcdev->config, buf, len);
>> +    virtio_ccw_write_config(vcdev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct virtio_config_ops virtio_ccw_ops = {
>> +    .get = virtio_ccw_config_get,
>> +    .set = virtio_ccw_config_set,
>> +    .find_vqs = virtio_ccw_find_vqs,
>> +};
>> +
>> +const struct virtio_config_ops *virtio_ccw_register(void)
>> +{
>> +    return &virtio_ccw_ops;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sense(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
>> +{
>> +    struct senseid *senseid;
>> +
>> +    senseid = alloc_io_mem(sizeof(*senseid), 0);
>> +    assert(senseid);
>> +
>> +    assert(!ccw_send(vcdev, CCW_CMD_SENSE_ID, senseid, 
>> sizeof(*senseid), 0));
>> +
>> +    assert(senseid->reserved == 0xff);
>> +
>> +    vcdev->cu_type = senseid->cu_type;
>> +    vcdev->cu_model = senseid->cu_model;
>> +    vcdev->dev_type = senseid->dev_type;
>> +    vcdev->dev_model = senseid->dev_model;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct virtio_ccw_device *find_vcdev_by_devid(int devid)
>> +{
>> +    struct virtio_ccw_device *dev;
>> +    struct linked_list *l;
>> +
>> +    for (l = vcdev_list.next; l != &vcdev_list; l = l->next) {
>> +        dev = container_of(l, struct virtio_ccw_device, list);
>> +        if (dev->cu_model == devid)
>> +            return dev;
>> +    }
>> +    return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct virtio_device *virtio_bind(u32 devid)
>> +{
>> +    struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev;
>> +
>> +    vcdev = find_vcdev_by_devid(devid);
>> +
>> +    return &vcdev->vdev;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int virtio_enumerate(int schid)
>> +{
>> +    struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev;
>> +
>> +    vcdev = alloc_io_mem(sizeof(*vcdev), 0);
>> +    assert(vcdev);
>> +    vcdev->schid = schid;
>> +
>> +    list_add(&vcdev_list, &vcdev->list);
>> +
>> +    assert(css_enable(schid, IO_SCH_ISC) == 0);
>> +    sense(vcdev);
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Must get a param */
> 
> I don't understand that comment, could you elaborate?

No, sorry.
I forgot what I wanted to say here.
May be it comes back when I will work on the comments from you and Andrew.


Thanks,
Pierre

-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-08 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-27 10:17 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/7] Extending VIRTIO with a data transfer test Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/7] arm: virtio: move VIRTIO transport initialization inside virtio-mmio Pierre Morel
2021-11-03  7:00   ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-03  7:41     ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-08 12:20       ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/7] s390x: css: add callback for emnumeration Pierre Morel
2021-11-03  7:29   ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-08 12:21     ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/7] s390x: virtio: CCW transport implementation Pierre Morel
2021-11-03  7:46   ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-08 12:35     ` Pierre Morel
2021-11-03  7:49   ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-08 12:34     ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2021-11-09  7:01       ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-09  8:51         ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/7] s390x: css: registering IRQ Pierre Morel
2021-11-03  8:01   ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-08 12:36     ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 5/7] virtio: implement the virtio_add_inbuf routine Pierre Morel
2021-11-03  7:51   ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-08 12:36     ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/7] s390x: virtio tests setup Pierre Morel
2021-11-03  7:56   ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-03  8:14     ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-08 13:00       ` Pierre Morel
2021-11-09  7:10         ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-09  8:42           ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-09  9:01             ` Pierre Morel
2021-11-08 12:53     ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 7/7] s390x: virtio data transfer Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=509a8f4f-89cc-fe80-4200-6776c503adbf@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox