From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, drjones@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/7] s390x: css: registering IRQ
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:01:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8aee772e-cb44-4d3d-16bd-186b90257407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1630059440-15586-5-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
On 27/08/2021 12.17, Pierre Morel wrote:
> Registering IRQ for the CSS level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/css.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/s390x/css_lib.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/css.h b/lib/s390x/css.h
> index 2005f4d7..0422f2e7 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/css.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/css.h
> @@ -402,4 +402,25 @@ struct measurement_block_format1 {
> uint32_t irq_prio_delay_time;
> };
>
> +#include <asm/arch_def.h>
> +static inline void disable_io_irq(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t mask;
> +
> + mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + mask &= ~PSW_MASK_IO;
> + load_psw_mask(mask);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void enable_io_irq(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t mask;
> +
> + mask = extract_psw_mask();
> + mask |= PSW_MASK_IO;
> + load_psw_mask(mask);
> +}
> +
> +int register_css_irq_func(void (*f)(void));
> +int unregister_css_irq_func(void (*f)(void));
> #endif
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/css_lib.c b/lib/s390x/css_lib.c
> index 484f9c41..a89fc93c 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/css_lib.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/css_lib.c
> @@ -350,8 +350,29 @@ bool css_disable_mb(int schid)
> return retry_count > 0;
> }
>
> -static struct irb irb;
> +static void (*css_irq_func)(void);
> +
> +int register_css_irq_func(void (*f)(void))
> +{
> + if (css_irq_func)
> + return -1;
> + css_irq_func = f;
> + assert(register_io_int_func(css_irq_io) == 0);
It's unlikely that we ever disable assert() in the k-u-t, but anyway, I'd
prefer not to put function calls within assert() statements, just in case.
So could you please replace this with:
rc = register_io_int_func(css_irq_io);
assert(rc == 0);
?
> + enable_io_isc(0x80 >> IO_SCH_ISC);
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> +int unregister_css_irq_func(void (*f)(void))
> +{
> + if (css_irq_func != f)
> + return -1;
> + enable_io_isc(0);
> + unregister_io_int_func(css_irq_io);
> + css_irq_func = NULL;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct irb irb;
> void css_irq_io(void)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -386,7 +407,9 @@ void css_irq_io(void)
> report(0, "tsch reporting sch %08x as not operational", sid);
> break;
> case 0:
> - /* Stay humble on success */
> + /* Call upper level IRQ routine */
> + if (css_irq_func)
> + css_irq_func();
> break;
> }
> pop:
>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-03 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-27 10:17 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/7] Extending VIRTIO with a data transfer test Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/7] arm: virtio: move VIRTIO transport initialization inside virtio-mmio Pierre Morel
2021-11-03 7:00 ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-03 7:41 ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-08 12:20 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/7] s390x: css: add callback for emnumeration Pierre Morel
2021-11-03 7:29 ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-08 12:21 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/7] s390x: virtio: CCW transport implementation Pierre Morel
2021-11-03 7:46 ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-08 12:35 ` Pierre Morel
2021-11-03 7:49 ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-08 12:34 ` Pierre Morel
2021-11-09 7:01 ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-09 8:51 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/7] s390x: css: registering IRQ Pierre Morel
2021-11-03 8:01 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2021-11-08 12:36 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 5/7] virtio: implement the virtio_add_inbuf routine Pierre Morel
2021-11-03 7:51 ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-08 12:36 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/7] s390x: virtio tests setup Pierre Morel
2021-11-03 7:56 ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-03 8:14 ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-08 13:00 ` Pierre Morel
2021-11-09 7:10 ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-09 8:42 ` Andrew Jones
2021-11-09 9:01 ` Pierre Morel
2021-11-08 12:53 ` Pierre Morel
2021-08-27 10:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 7/7] s390x: virtio data transfer Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8aee772e-cb44-4d3d-16bd-186b90257407@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox