From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>, <yuan.yao@linux.intel.com>,
<jingqi.liu@intel.com>, <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
<isaku.yamahata@intel.com>, <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] KVM: x86: emulation: Apply LAM when emulating data access
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:53:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+m0QToEqlqQz/ba@gao-cwp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230209024022.3371768-9-robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:40:21AM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
>When in KVM emulation, calculated a LA for data access, apply LAM if
>guest is at that moment LAM active, so that the following canonical check
>can pass.
This sounds weird. Passing the canonical checking isn't the goal. Emulating
the behavior of a LAM-capable processor on memory accesses is.
>
>Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
>---
> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 6 ++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>index 5cc3efa0e21c..d52037151133 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>@@ -700,6 +700,12 @@ static __always_inline int __linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> *max_size = 0;
> switch (mode) {
> case X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64:
>+ /*
>+ * LAM applies only on data access
>+ */
one-line comments look like /* Bla bla bla */
>+ if (!fetch && is_lam_active(ctxt->vcpu))
>+ la = kvm_untagged_addr(la, ctxt->vcpu);
>+
> *linear = la;
> va_bits = ctxt_virt_addr_bits(ctxt);
> if (!__is_canonical_address(la, va_bits))
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>index 7228895d4a6f..9397e9f4e061 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>@@ -135,6 +135,19 @@ static inline int is_long_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> #endif
> }
>
>+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>+static inline bool is_lam_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
Drop this function because kvm_untagged_addr() already does these checks
(and taking user/supervisor pointers into consideration).
>+{
>+ return kvm_read_cr3(vcpu) & (X86_CR3_LAM_U48 | X86_CR3_LAM_U57) ||
>+ kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_LAM_SUP);
>+}
>+#else
>+static inline bool is_lam_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>+{
>+ return false;
>+}
>+#endif
>+
> static inline bool is_64_bit_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> int cs_db, cs_l;
>--
>2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-13 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-09 2:40 [PATCH v4 0/9] Linear Address Masking (LAM) KVM Enabling Robert Hoo
2023-02-09 2:40 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] KVM: x86: Intercept CR4.LAM_SUP when LAM feature is enabled in guest Robert Hoo
2023-02-09 9:21 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-09 12:48 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-10 3:29 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-02-10 5:02 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-10 16:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-14 1:27 ` Binbin Wu
2023-02-14 6:11 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-14 9:00 ` Binbin Wu
2023-02-14 12:24 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-14 12:36 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-16 5:31 ` Binbin Wu
2023-02-16 5:54 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-09 2:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] KVM: x86: MMU: Clear CR3 LAM bits when allocate shadow root Robert Hoo
2023-02-09 9:55 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-09 13:02 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-14 2:55 ` Binbin Wu
2023-02-15 1:17 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-16 2:14 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-10 3:38 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-02-11 3:12 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-09 2:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] KVM: x86: MMU: Commets update Robert Hoo
2023-02-10 6:59 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-10 7:55 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-10 16:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-09 2:40 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] KVM: x86: MMU: Integrate LAM bits when build guest CR3 Robert Hoo
2023-02-10 14:04 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-11 6:24 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-11 6:29 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-09 2:40 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] KVM: x86: Untag LAM bits when applicable Robert Hoo
2023-02-10 15:04 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-11 5:57 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-16 6:37 ` Binbin Wu
2023-02-09 2:40 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] KVM: x86: When KVM judges CR3 valid or not, consider LAM bits Robert Hoo
2023-02-13 2:01 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-13 13:25 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-14 6:18 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-14 7:00 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-18 5:44 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-09 2:40 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] KVM: x86: When guest set CR3, handle LAM bits semantics Robert Hoo
2023-02-13 3:31 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-14 5:28 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-14 6:48 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-09 2:40 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] KVM: x86: emulation: Apply LAM when emulating data access Robert Hoo
2023-02-13 3:53 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2023-02-14 5:38 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-09 2:40 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] KVM: x86: LAM: Expose LAM CPUID to user space VMM Robert Hoo
2023-02-21 5:47 ` Binbin Wu
2023-02-21 7:26 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-21 8:26 ` Binbin Wu
2023-02-21 11:13 ` Yu Zhang
2023-02-21 13:18 ` Binbin Wu
2023-02-21 14:36 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-09 6:15 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Linear Address Masking (LAM) KVM Enabling Chao Gao
2023-02-09 12:25 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-09 17:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-10 2:07 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-10 3:17 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-10 8:41 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-10 8:39 ` Robert Hoo
2023-02-10 9:22 ` Chao Gao
2023-02-13 9:02 ` Binbin Wu
2023-02-13 13:16 ` Robert Hoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+m0QToEqlqQz/ba@gao-cwp \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jingqi.liu@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yuan.yao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox