From: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
To: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Joey Gouly" <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
"Steffen Eiden" <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"Zenghui Yu" <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Saket Dumbre" <saket.dumbre@intel.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Chengwen Feng" <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Mikołaj Lenczewski" <miko.lenczewski@arm.com>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"Zeng Heng" <zengheng4@huawei.com>,
mrigendrachaubey <mrigendra.chaubey@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"Yeoreum Yun" <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Kevin Brodsky" <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
"James Clark" <james.clark@linaro.org>,
"Fuad Tabba" <tabba@google.com>,
"Raghavendra Rao Ananta" <rananta@google.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Sascha Bischoff" <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com>,
"Anshuman Khandual" <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
"Tian Zheng" <zhengtian10@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] KVM: arm64: dirty_bit: Add base FEAT_HACDBS cleaning routine
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 10:36:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akKtKH8O5hngLenm@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629111820.1873540-7-leo.bras@arm.com>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 12:17:54PM +0100, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Introduce the basic cleaning routine that is going to be used for both
> dirty-bitmap and dirty-ring routines.
>
> It sets the required registers with the input buffer, and wait for
> HACDBSIRQ to happen, which means either the task is done, or there was some
> error during processing.
>
> It is ran with preemption disabled, as a task being scheduled in could
> change the translation registers used by HACDBS and end up corrupting the
> current dirty-bit tracking and the sched-in task's S2 pagetables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> index 789da8712b1b..e4283828b780 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> @@ -1,36 +1,117 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> /*
> * Copyright (C) 2026 ARM Ltd.
> * Author: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
> */
>
> #include <asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> #include <linux/kconfig.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hacdbs, hacdbs_pcp) = {
> .status = HACDBS_OFF,
> .size = 0,
> };
>
> /* HDBSS entry field definitions */
> #define HDBSS_ENTRY_VALID BIT(0)
> #define HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL_SHIFT (1)
> #define HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL_MASK (GENMASK(3, 1))
> #define HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL(x) \
> (((x) << HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL_SHIFT) & HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL_MASK)
> #define HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL_RESV HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL(-4)
> #define HDBSS_ENTRY_IPA GENMASK_ULL(55, 12)
>
> static __ro_after_init int hacdbsirq = -1;
>
> +static void hacdbs_start(u64 *hw_entries, int size)
> +{
> + u64 br;
> + /* Each entry is 8 bytes */
> + int size_b = size * sizeof(hw_entries[0]);
> + int size_p2 = max(roundup_pow_of_two(size_b), PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + /* If not using the full size of the array, put a stop entry at the end */
> + if (size_b < size_p2)
> + hw_entries[size] = HDBSS_ENTRY_VALID | HDBSS_ENTRY_TTWL_RESV;
> +
> + sysreg_clear_set_s(SYS_HACDBSCONS_EL2,
> + HACDBSCONS_EL2_ERR_REASON | HACDBSCONS_EL2_INDEX, 0);
> +
> + br = (virt_to_phys(hw_entries) & HACDBSBR_EL2_BADDR_MASK) |
> + FIELD_PREP(HACDBSBR_EL2_SZ, ilog2(size_p2) - 12) |
> + FIELD_PREP(HACDBSBR_EL2_EN, 1);
> +
> + this_cpu_write(hacdbs_pcp.status, HACDBS_RUNNING);
> + this_cpu_write(hacdbs_pcp.size, size);
> + write_sysreg_s(br, SYS_HACDBSBR_EL2);
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +static int hacdbs_stop(void)
> +{
> + write_sysreg_s(0, SYS_HACDBSBR_EL2);
> + isb();
> +
> + if (this_cpu_read(hacdbs_pcp.status) == HACDBS_ERROR) {
> + /* In case of error, HACDBSCONS_EL2.INDEX should point the faulty entry */
> + u64 cons = read_sysreg_s(SYS_HACDBSCONS_EL2);
> + int idx = FIELD_GET(HACDBSCONS_EL2_INDEX, cons);
> +
> + this_cpu_write(hacdbs_pcp.status, HACDBS_IDLE);
> +
> + return idx;
> + }
> +
> + return this_cpu_read(hacdbs_pcp.size);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Clears dirty-bits for an array of pages (hw_entries) using HACDBS
> + * Returns the number of items cleaned from the array. If returns value < size,
> + * there was an error in the processing.
> + */
> +static int dirty_bit_clear(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *hw_entries, int size)
> +{
> + u64 hcr_el2;
> + int ret;
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> +
> + hcr_el2 = read_sysreg(HCR_EL2);
> + write_sysreg(hcr_el2 | HCR_EL2_VM, HCR_EL2);
sysreg_clear_set_hcr(). I'm pretty sure all the speculative AT errata
depend on HCR_EL2.VM being set _after_ the stage-2 MMU has been loaded.
> + __load_stage2(&kvm->arch.mmu);
Pretty sure you need an ISB here to ensure loading the MMU is ordered
with enabling HACDBS.
> + hacdbs_start(hw_entries, size);
> +
> + do {
> + wfi();
> + } while (this_cpu_read(hacdbs_pcp.status) == HACDBS_RUNNING);
This is exactly why I said you should just poll hardware instead. It is
entirely possible that the IRQ arrives before you WFI.
> + ret = hacdbs_stop();
> +
> + write_sysreg(hcr_el2, HCR_EL2);
write_sysreg_hcr()
Thanks,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 11:17 [PATCH v2 00/13] KVM Dirty-bit cleaning hw accelerator (HACDBS) Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] KVM: arm64: HDBSS bits Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 12:57 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] KVM: arm64: Enable eager hugepage splitting if HDBSS is available Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 14:47 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 17:06 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-30 12:58 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-30 15:44 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-30 17:09 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-30 18:43 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] arm64/cpufeature: Add system-wide FEAT_HACDBS detection Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] arm64/sysreg: Add HACDBS consumer and base registers Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] KVM: arm64: Detect (via ACPI) and initialize HACDBSIRQ Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 15:43 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 16:52 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-06-30 14:52 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 17:22 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-30 14:50 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-30 16:03 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-30 17:19 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] KVM: arm64: dirty_bit: Add base FEAT_HACDBS cleaning routine Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 15:54 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 17:36 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2026-06-30 14:59 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-30 19:06 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] kvm: Add arch-generic interface for hw-accelerated dirty-bitmap cleaning Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 16:07 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] KVM: arm64: Add hardware-accelerated dirty-bitmap cleaning routine Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 16:49 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] KVM: arm64: Dirty-bitmap: avoid splitting previously split blocks Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 17:07 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] kvm/dirty_ring: Introduce get_memslot and move helpers to header Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] kvm/dirty_ring: Add arch-generic interface for hw-accelerated dirty-ring cleaning Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 17:09 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] KVM: arm64: Add hardware-accelerated dirty-ring cleaning routine Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 17:26 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] KVM: arm64: Enable KVM_HW_DIRTY_BIT Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 11:52 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akKtKH8O5hngLenm@kernel.org \
--to=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.bras@arm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
--cc=mrigendra.chaubey@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=saket.dumbre@intel.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengtian10@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox