From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Tina Zhang <zhang_wei@open-hieco.net>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
mlevitsk@redhat.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
zhouyanjing@hygon.cn, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: nSVM: Expose DecodeAssists to L1
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 20:21:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akxwt1mX6blSnkxI@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5645a47-c346-4e63-a5c6-c88bb39a3ee1@open-hieco.net>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2026, Tina Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 7/7/2026 9:32 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 5:02 PM Tina Zhang <zhang_wei@open-hieco.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I will take another look for the next version and try to handle the
> > > remaining pieces properly, while also making sure we don't expose stale
> > > or incorrectly synthesized decode-assist state for emulated exits.
> >
> > Naples erratum 1096 seems to imply that the instruction bytes stored
> > in the VMCB are not necessarily the same instruction bytes that were
> > fetched and decoded to lead to the #PF/#NPF. Hence, in the case of
> > emulation, it might be sufficient to read the instruction bytes quite
> > late in nested_svm_vmexit(). That would certainly simplify the
> > plumbing.
The plumbing doesn't seem all that complex though.
> Thanks for the suggestion, and for pointing me at Naples erratum 1096. I
> wasn't aware of that erratum.
>
> My understanding is that late fetching/decoding from guest RIP is not
> strictly equivalent to preserving the exact bytes observed by the original
> decoder, as the code bytes or translations could theoretically change in
> between. But the suggested workaround for erratum 1096 also tells the
> hypervisor to decode the instruction at the instruction pointer when
> GuestInstrBytes cannot be used, so it seems that this is an acceptable
> model/fallback.
>
> For KVM-synthesized/emulated #PF/#NPF nested VM-Exits there is no fresh
> hardware GuestInstrBytes state to propagate to VMCB12. So I agree that it
> should be simpler to avoid plumbing instruction bytes from the emulator, and
> instead fetch the bytes late when constructing the nested VM-Exit for L1.
>
> I'll try this direction first.
I'd rather not, at least not as the primary way. It's going to raise a different
set of issues, e.g. how to behave if reading guest memory fails. That's probably
unavoidable, e.g. if reading the INVPCID descriptor fails, then KVM doesn't even
have a pre-decoded instruction to work with, but it should ideally be a last
resort.
E.g. where the NULL case triggers an on-demand read of guest memory.
diff --git arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index ba985a02208a..812af3a8d8b9 100644
--- arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static void nested_svm_inject_npf_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
u64 fault_stage;
+ u8 *insn_bytes;
/*
* For hardware NPF exits, the GUEST_FAULT_STAGE bits are only
@@ -68,7 +69,14 @@ static void nested_svm_inject_npf_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
(fault->error_code & ~PFERR_GUEST_FAULT_STAGE_MASK);
vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = fault->address;
- nested_svm_vmexit(svm);
+ if (from_hardware)
+ insn_bytes = svm->nested.vmcb02.ptr->control.insn_bytes;
+ else if (vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt->eip == kvm_rip_read(vcpu))
+ insn_bytes = vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt->fetch.data
+ else
+ insn_bytes = NULL;
+
+ nested_svm_vmexit(svm, insn_bytes);
}
static u64 nested_svm_get_tdp_pdptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int index)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 12:52 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: nSVM: Expose DecodeAssists to L1 Tina Zhang
2026-06-29 12:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: nSVM: Virtualize DecodeAssists for nested guests Tina Zhang
2026-06-29 13:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 15:11 ` Jim Mattson
2026-06-29 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Add nested SVM DecodeAssists test Tina Zhang
2026-06-30 15:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: nSVM: Expose DecodeAssists to L1 Jim Mattson
2026-07-06 22:10 ` mlevitsk
2026-07-07 0:01 ` Tina Zhang
2026-07-07 1:32 ` Jim Mattson
2026-07-07 2:44 ` Tina Zhang
2026-07-07 3:21 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-07-07 3:25 ` Jim Mattson
2026-07-07 3:32 ` Jim Mattson
2026-07-07 14:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 15:19 ` Jim Mattson
2026-07-07 15:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 18:56 ` Jim Mattson
2026-07-07 14:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 15:24 ` Jim Mattson
2026-07-07 15:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 18:23 ` Jim Mattson
2026-07-07 19:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 22:34 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-08 0:53 ` Tina Zhang
2026-07-08 14:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-08 17:47 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akxwt1mX6blSnkxI@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=zhang_wei@open-hieco.net \
--cc=zhouyanjing@hygon.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox