From: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: QEMU-KVM and video performance
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:14:40 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004192101000.10357@bbs.intern> (raw)
Hello,
Finally I got QEMU-KVM to work but video performance under DOS is very
low (QEMU 0.12.3 stable and QEMU GIT master branch is fast, QEMU KVM is
slow)
I'm measuring 2 performance critical video performance parameters:
1.) INT 10h, function AX=4F05h (set same window/set window/get window)
2.) Memory performance to segment page A000h
So BIOS performance (which might be port performance to VGA index/value
port) is about factor 5 slower, memory performance is about factor 100
slower.
QEMU 0.12.3 and QEMU GIT performance is the same (in the measurement
tolerance) and listed only once, QEMU KVM is much more slower (details see
below).
Test programs can be provided, source code will be release soon.
Any ideas why KVM is so slow? Any ideas for improvement?
Thnx.
Ciao,
Gerhard
--
http://www.wiesinger.com/
==========================================================
QEMU 0.12.3 and QEMU GIT
==========================================================
INT10PER performance information V1.0, (c) 2010 by Gerhard Wiesinger
VESA set window: seconds=2, operations=1000000, ops/s=500000.0
VESA set window (nc): seconds=2, operations=1000000, ops/s=500000.0
VESA get window: seconds=2, operations=1000000, ops/s=500000.0
MEMPERF video performance V1.0, (c) 2010 by Gerhard Wiesinger
BYTE performance, time=10s, bytes=930611200, rate=88.750 MB/s
WORD performance, time=10s, bytes=766771200, rate=73.125 MB/s
DWORD performance, time=10s, bytes=812646400, rate=77.500 MB/s
QWORD performance, time=10s, bytes=806092800, rate=76.875 MB/s
==========================================================
==========================================================
QEMU-KVM
==========================================================
INT10PER performance information V1.0, (c) 2010 by Gerhard Wiesinger
VESA set window: seconds=9, operations=1000000, ops/s=111111.1
VESA set window (nc): seconds=9, operations=1000000, ops/s=111111.1
VESA get window: seconds=5, operations=1000000, ops/s=200000.0
MEMPERF video performance V1.0, (c) 2010 by Gerhard Wiesinger
BYTE performance, time=13s, bytes=13107200, rate=0.962 MB/s
WORD performance, time=13s, bytes=13107200, rate=0.962 MB/s
DWORD performance, time=12s, bytes=13107200, rate=1.042 MB/s
QWORD performance, time=13s, bytes=13107200, rate=0.962 MB/s
==========================================================
next reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-19 19:14 Gerhard Wiesinger [this message]
2010-04-21 8:59 ` QEMU-KVM and video performance Avi Kivity
2010-04-21 10:08 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jamie Lokier
2010-04-21 10:49 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-21 18:14 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2010-04-21 20:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-04-22 5:37 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2010-04-22 6:57 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-21 18:39 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-21 20:51 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-21 21:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-22 5:44 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2010-05-12 10:34 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-21 18:09 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2010-04-21 18:33 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-21 18:50 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2010-04-21 18:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-21 19:08 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2010-04-21 21:30 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-22 6:12 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2010-05-12 10:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-21 20:56 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-22 6:04 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2010-04-22 7:03 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-09 19:35 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2010-05-10 7:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-12 6:14 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2010-05-12 6:39 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2011-02-18 7:32 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU-KVM and video performance - Update Gerhard Wiesinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1004192101000.10357@bbs.intern \
--to=lists@wiesinger.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox