kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Logan Odell <loganodell@google.com>,
	arnd@arndb.de,  pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, rppt@kernel.org,
	pratyush@kernel.org,  graf@amazon.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com,  maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, alex@shazbot.org,  kevin.tian@intel.com,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,  joro@8bytes.org,
	will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	 linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,  linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] liveupdate: Move to feature flags for LUO and memfd ABI compatibility
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 15:42:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqMyXE-fD-UN6w5L@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910221832.GH3968357@nvidia.com>

On Thu, Sep 10, 2026, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Sean's initial email was asking for strict never-break ABI compatability
> rules on top, and that is what I've been reacting to.

No, I was never asking for that.  I think we just have a different interpretation
of ABI, or rather are talking about different pieces of ABI.

I am still asking for never-break serialization format compatibility, i.e. the
more literal save/restore ABI.  I'm not asking for full backwards/forwards
compatibility across all kernels version, i.e. the higher level "kernel" ABI.

To phrase things differently: I am a-ok if kernels are inherently incompatible
because they fundamentally operate differently and/or support different features.
I am not ok if we end up with incompatible kernels because the save/restore
interfaces and payloads are poorly designed, lack abstraction, etc.  

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03  2:34 [RFC PATCH 0/3] liveupdate: Move to feature flags for LUO and memfd ABI compatibility Logan Odell
2026-09-03  2:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] luo: Move to feature flags instead of compatibility strings Logan Odell
2026-09-03  2:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  2:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] luo: Export feature support to vmlinux section Logan Odell
2026-09-03  2:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03  2:34 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] luo: memfd: Move to feature flags instead of compatibility strings Logan Odell
2026-09-03  2:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] liveupdate: Move to feature flags for LUO and memfd ABI compatibility Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-04 22:24   ` David Matlack
2026-09-05  1:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-10  0:58       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 14:34         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-10 15:35           ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-10 17:12             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-10 21:27               ` David Matlack
2026-09-10 22:18                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-10 22:42                   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-09-10 22:57                     ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aqMyXE-fD-UN6w5L@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loganodell@google.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).