From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Shivansh Dhiman <shivansh.dhiman@amd.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: nSVM: Sanitize nested DR6 using kvm_dr6_fixed()
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 10:26:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arau02kKKLWDOFcE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721052113.18B251F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> > index 8d1967f5c099f..9b1afa47c54c9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> > @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> >
> > if (unlikely(new_vmcb12 || vmcb12_is_dirty(control, VMCB_DR))) {
> > vmcb02->save.dr7 = svm->nested.save.dr7 | DR7_FIXED_1;
> > - svm->vcpu.arch.dr6 = svm->nested.save.dr6 | DR6_ACTIVE_LOW;
> > + svm->vcpu.arch.dr6 = svm->nested.save.dr6 | kvm_dr6_fixed(vcpu);
>
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but kvm_deliver_exception_payload()
> in arch/x86/kvm/x86.c has the exact same flaw with DR6_ACTIVE_LOW.
>
> Could it be fixed using the newly exported kvm_dr6_fixed() helper?
>
> Currently, kvm_deliver_exception_payload() executes:
>
> case DB_VECTOR:
> ...
> vcpu->arch.dr6 |= DR6_ACTIVE_LOW;
> vcpu->arch.dr6 |= ex->payload;
> vcpu->arch.dr6 ^= ex->payload & DR6_ACTIVE_LOW;
>
> This unconditionally forces all active-low bits to 1 before applying the
> current exception payload, destroying any previously accumulated 0 bits.
>
> If a guest OS relies on the Bus Lock Detect #DB to mitigate DoS attacks,
> and another #DB event (like a Single Step) occurs before the guest clears
> DR6, kvm_deliver_exception_payload() will force DR6 bit 11 back to 1.
>
> Because the new #DB payload does not have the bus lock bit set, the
> subsequent XOR leaves bit 11 as 1.
>
> Does this destroy the accumulated event and allow a malicious task to evade
> detection?
>
> Could this be updated to use kvm_dr6_fixed(vcpu) instead of DR6_ACTIVE_LOW
> to avoid clearing previously accumulated active-low DR6 events?
No, the whole thing needs to be rewritten. The issue isn't active-low vs. fixed-1,
it's that the semantics of each bit are feature specific, i.e. don't correlate with
active-high vs. active-low.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 5:05 [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support and refactor LBRV Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] KVM: SVM: Refactor svm_update_lbrv() Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 6:40 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-07-21 9:16 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-09-25 17:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 22:16 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: nSVM: Disable LBRV in nested control cache when unsupported Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: nSVM: Sanitize nested DR6 using kvm_dr6_fixed() Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 17:26 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-09-25 17:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 22:16 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] KVM: SVM: Turn DEBUGCTL_RESERVED_BITS into a helper Shivansh Dhiman
2026-09-25 17:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 22:29 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support Shivansh Dhiman
2026-09-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support and refactor LBRV Sean Christopherson
2026-09-25 23:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-28 18:38 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-10-01 20:18 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-10-01 23:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 23:05 ` Shivansh Dhiman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arau02kKKLWDOFcE@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shivansh.dhiman@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox