From: Shivansh Dhiman <shivansh.dhiman@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>, <yosry@kernel.org>,
<jmattson@google.com>, <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
<nikunj.dadhania@amd.com>, <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
<santosh.shukla@amd.com>,
Shivansh Dhiman <shivansh.dhiman@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: nSVM: Sanitize nested DR6 using kvm_dr6_fixed()
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 03:46:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3360430-c402-443d-892c-20d72a01851e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <arax0JmdoGYoSpGw@google.com>
On 25-09-26 23:09, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> The shortlog is again not precise enough. With this:>
> KVM: nSVM: Sanitize nested DR6 using kvm_dr6_fixed
>
> the reader doesn't actually know what behavior is being modified. It's also way
> too literal; the shortlog+changelog should strive to describe the change in human-
> friendly words, e.g. in conversational language, not be a play-by-play of the code
> change. And that matters in this case, because the poorly named kvm_dr6_fixed()
> makes it even hard to understand what is actually happening.
>
> KVM: nSVM: Don't assume all active-low bits DR6 are fixed-1
That reads better. I'll keep this mind when posting any new series.
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2026, Shivansh Dhiman wrote:
>> When preparing vmcb02 for nested VMRUN, KVM ORs DR6_ACTIVE_LOW into the
>> guest DR6 to force the fixed bits to 1. DR6_ACTIVE_LOW forces bit 11
>> (DR6_BUS_LOCK) to 1 unconditionally.
>>
>> DR6_BUS_LOCK is active-low (the CPU clears it to 0 to report a bus lock), so
>> forcing it to 1 unconditionally would prevent an L2 from ever observing a
>> bus lock (DR6.BLD == 0) across a nested VMRUN.
>>
>> Use kvm_dr6_fixed() instead, which forces DR6_RTM and DR6_BUS_LOCK based on
>
> We should kill off DR6_FIXED_1 and rename kvm_dr6_fixed() to kvm_get_dr6_fixed_1()
> as prep patches.
>
> As above, the changelog is too much of a play-by-play. The names of the macros
> don't matter, and knowing the exact bit position isn't necessary to describe and
> understand the change.
>
> When preparing vmcb02 for nested VMRUN, force only the actual fixed-1 bits
> instead of setting all active-low bits. The flaw is currently benign, as
> the only active-low bits supported by KVM are RTM (Restricted Transactional
> Memory) and BLD (Bus Lock Detect), neither of which is currently supported
> on SVM, but that's about to change. I.e. this will break upcoming Bus Lock
> Detect support as the guest will never see DR6.BLD=0.
Thanks for the reword.
-Shivansh
>
>> the guest's CPUID. DR6_RTM is a reserved bit on AMD and is thus always set
>> to 1. DR6_BUS_LOCK is left writable once the guest supports Bus Lock
>> Detect.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 5:05 [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support and refactor LBRV Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] KVM: SVM: Refactor svm_update_lbrv() Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 6:40 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-07-21 9:16 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-09-25 17:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 22:16 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: nSVM: Disable LBRV in nested control cache when unsupported Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: nSVM: Sanitize nested DR6 using kvm_dr6_fixed() Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 17:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-25 17:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 22:16 ` Shivansh Dhiman [this message]
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] KVM: SVM: Turn DEBUGCTL_RESERVED_BITS into a helper Shivansh Dhiman
2026-09-25 17:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 22:29 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support Shivansh Dhiman
2026-09-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support and refactor LBRV Sean Christopherson
2026-09-25 23:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-28 18:38 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-10-01 20:18 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-10-01 23:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 23:05 ` Shivansh Dhiman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b3360430-c402-443d-892c-20d72a01851e@amd.com \
--to=shivansh.dhiman@amd.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj.dadhania@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yosry@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox