From: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
"sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev"
<sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] KVM: pfncache: Use RCU for readers instead of a rwlock
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 17:58:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbb2ad42d2ee3b2c20cfc31c3d58a9fecebb77e4.camel@amazon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anS8C4Cxqy6ehCo3@google.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1709 bytes --]
On Thu, 2026-08-06 at 09:53 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2026, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > Replace the per-cache rwlock with RCU for the read side.
>
> I don't hate the idea, but I am very against using RCU. Unless it's "impossible",
> e.g. because synchronize_srcu() allocates memory and breaks OOM kill, I would
> strongly prefer to use SRCU, probably with a dedicated kvm->gpc_srcu, so that
> synchronization doesn't need to wait on all CPUs in the system. The tail latencies
> for synchronize_rcu() are horrendous, especially for many-CPU systems. If it
> were only mmu_notifiers that got hit, it miiiight be acceptable, but since this
> will affect vCPU tasks in the refresh() path as well, normal RCU is pretty much
> a non-starter.
Yeah, the refresh() path got pretty slow in my first attempt, before
optimising that *not* to have a grace period if the memslot generation
changed but the actual GPA→uHVA (and memslot) don't *change*.
> Even SRCU could be problematic: if synchronize_srcu_expedited() is forced to wait,
> the wait time can easily get to 20+ milliseconds, which again is a non-starter for
> things like steal-time updates and nVMX pages.
But we don't have to synchronize from the read side. The code path
which will do so most often is gfn_to_pfn_cache_invalidate_start(). And
the refresh() path which is already the fallback slow path which can
sleep. Although in my tree I've optimised that *not* to incur a grace
period when it's avoidable, as noted above.
I'm more concerned by the fact that srcu_gp_end() might have to
*allocate*, while the OOM reaper path waits for it. I'll see how we can
deal with that...
[-- Attachment #1.2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4017 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 215 bytes --]
Amazon Development Centre (London) Ltd. Registered in England and Wales with registration number 04543232 with its registered office at 1 Principal Place, Worship Street, London EC2A 2FA, United Kingdom.
[-- Attachment #2.2: Type: text/html, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 19:55 [PATCH v3 0/7] KVM: x86/xen: Fix Xen/GPC/PREEMPT_RT issues with rwlock_t Woodhouse, David
2026-08-05 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] KVM: pfncache: use a dedicated invalidation sequence for cache refresh Woodhouse, David
2026-08-05 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mm/mmu_notifier: Remove non_block_start/end() from notifier invocation Woodhouse, David
2026-08-05 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] KVM: pfncache: Use RCU for readers instead of a rwlock Woodhouse, David
2026-08-05 20:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 16:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 17:58 ` Woodhouse, David [this message]
2026-08-06 18:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 18:23 ` Woodhouse, David
2026-08-07 8:56 ` Woodhouse, David
2026-08-07 10:48 ` David Woodhouse
2026-08-06 20:38 ` David Woodhouse
2026-08-06 21:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-08-06 22:02 ` David Woodhouse
2026-08-05 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] KVM: x86/xen: Extract delivery of event to vCPU into a separate helper Woodhouse, David
2026-08-05 20:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 22:35 ` David Woodhouse
2026-08-06 10:00 ` David Woodhouse
2026-08-06 14:32 ` David Woodhouse
2026-08-05 19:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: x86/xen: Explicitly tag "shared info" page as never being dirty tracked Woodhouse, David
2026-08-05 19:56 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] KVM: x86/xen: Don't dirty track "vCPU info" page Woodhouse, David
2026-08-05 19:56 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] KVM: x86: Use gfn_to_pfn_cache for steal time / preempted status Woodhouse, David
2026-08-05 21:15 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bbb2ad42d2ee3b2c20cfc31c3d58a9fecebb77e4.camel@amazon.co.uk \
--to=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox