From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not recover dirty-tracked NX Huge Pages
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:28:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d636e626-ae33-0119-545d-a0b60cbe0ff7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2l247/1GzVm4mJH@google.com>
On 11/7/22 22:21, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>
> Hmm, and the memslot heuristic doesn't address the recovery worker holding mmu_lock
> for write. On a non-preemptible kernel, rwlock_needbreak() is always false, e.g.
> the worker won't yield to vCPUs that are trying to handle non-fast page faults.
> The worker should eventually reach steady state by unaccounting everything, but
> that might take a while.
I'm not sure what you mean here? The recovery worker will still
decrease to_zap by 1 on every unaccounted NX hugepage, and go to sleep
after it reaches 0.
Also, David's test used a 10-second halving time for the recovery
thread. With the 1 hour time the effect would Perhaps the 1 hour time
used by default by KVM is overly conservative, but 1% over 10 seconds is
certainly a lot larger an effect, than 1% over 1 hour.
So, I'm queuing the patch.
Paolo
> An alternative idea to the memslot heuristic would be to add a knob to allow
> disabling the recovery thread on a per-VM basis. Userspace should know that it's
> dirty logging a given VM for migration.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-17 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-03 20:44 [PATCH v2] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not recover dirty-tracked NX Huge Pages David Matlack
2022-11-07 21:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 16:28 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-11-17 16:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 16:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-11-17 17:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-17 17:15 ` David Matlack
2022-11-17 19:07 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d636e626-ae33-0119-545d-a0b60cbe0ff7@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox