public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Nico Böhr" <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/6] s390x: sclp: Rework sclp_facilities_setup() for simpler control flow
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 13:05:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f82ad19a-5576-4a10-82f4-1c1577af2fef@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421-vsie-stfle-fac-v3-3-3cee84efefa3@linux.ibm.com>

On 4/21/26 13:31, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> Reverse the order of operations to allow for early exits with increasing
> cpu offsets when reading facility bits in the extended range.
> 
> This is done to ease future additions like the one in the next patch in
> this series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> ---

I have a feeling that we start coding ourselves into a corner here.
Wouldn't something like this be enough to fix the offset checks? With 
that we don't need checks in sclp_facilities_setup() anymore.

diff --git i/lib/s390x/sclp.c w/lib/s390x/sclp.c
index 2f902e39..1ffcf448 100644
--- i/lib/s390x/sclp.c
+++ w/lib/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -142,6 +142,9 @@ static bool sclp_feat_check(int byte, int bit)
  {
         uint8_t *rib = (uint8_t *)read_info;

+       if (read_info->offset_cpu <= byte)
+               return false;
+
         return !!(rib[byte] & (0x80 >> bit));
  }



  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-22 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-21 11:31 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/6] s390x: Add test for STFLE interpretive execution (format-2) Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-21 11:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/6] s390x: snippets: Add reset_guest() to lib Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-21 11:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/6] s390x: sclp: Remove unnecessary padding from struct sclp_facilities Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-21 11:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/6] s390x: sclp: Rework sclp_facilities_setup() for simpler control flow Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-22 11:05   ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2026-04-22 13:20     ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-21 11:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/6] s390x: sclp: Use sclp_feat_check directly to read DIAG318 feature bit Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-21 11:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/6] s390x: sclp: Add detection of alternate STFLE facilities Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-22 12:38   ` Janosch Frank
2026-04-21 11:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/6] s390x: Add test for STFLE interpretive execution (format-2) Christoph Schlameuss
2026-04-22 12:39   ` Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f82ad19a-5576-4a10-82f4-1c1577af2fef@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox