From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool v3 3/3] vfio-pci: Re-enable INTx mode when disable MSI/MSIX
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 12:06:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fea39efb-1bc1-deff-e1a0-f695db429abb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190326074131.4284-4-leo.yan@linaro.org>
On 26/03/2019 07:41, Leo Yan wrote:
> Since PCI forbids enabling INTx, MSI or MSIX at the same time, it's by
> default to disable INTx mode when enable MSI/MSIX mode; but this logic is
> easily broken if the guest PCI driver detects the MSI/MSIX cannot work as
> expected and tries to rollback to use INTx mode. In this case, the INTx
> mode has been disabled and has no chance to re-enable it, thus both INTx
> mode and MSI/MSIX mode cannot work in vfio.
>
> Below shows the detailed flow for introducing this issue:
>
> vfio_pci_configure_dev_irqs()
> `-> vfio_pci_enable_intx()
>
> vfio_pci_enable_msis()
> `-> vfio_pci_disable_intx()
>
> vfio_pci_disable_msis() => Guest PCI driver disables MSI
>
> To fix this issue, when disable MSI/MSIX we need to check if INTx mode
> is available for this device or not; if the device can support INTx then
> re-enable it so that the device can fallback to use it.
>
> Since vfio_pci_disable_intx() / vfio_pci_enable_intx() pair functions
> may be called for multiple times, this patch uses 'intx_fd == -1' to
> denote the INTx is disabled, the pair functions can directly bail out
> when detect INTx has been disabled and enabled respectively.
>
> Suggested-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> ---
> vfio/pci.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/vfio/pci.c b/vfio/pci.c
> index 3c39844..3b2b1e7 100644
> --- a/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct vfio_irq_eventfd {
> msi_update_state(state, val, VFIO_PCI_MSI_STATE_EMPTY)
>
> static void vfio_pci_disable_intx(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_device *vdev);
> +static int vfio_pci_enable_intx(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_device *vdev);
>
> static int vfio_pci_enable_msis(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_device *vdev,
> bool msix)
> @@ -50,17 +51,14 @@ static int vfio_pci_enable_msis(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_device *vdev,
> if (!msi_is_enabled(msis->virt_state))
> return 0;
>
> - if (pdev->irq_modes & VFIO_PCI_IRQ_MODE_INTX) {
> - /*
> - * PCI (and VFIO) forbids enabling INTx, MSI or MSIX at the same
> - * time. Since INTx has to be enabled from the start (we don't
> - * have a reliable way to know when the user starts using it),
> - * disable it now.
> - */
> + /*
> + * PCI (and VFIO) forbids enabling INTx, MSI or MSIX at the same
> + * time. Since INTx has to be enabled from the start (after enabling
> + * 'pdev->intx_fd' will be assigned to an eventfd and doesn't equal
> + * to the init value -1), disable it now.
> + */
I don't think the comment change is useful, we don't need that much
detail. The text that you replaced was trying to explain why we enable
INTx from the start, and would still apply (although it should have been
s/user/guest/)
> + if (pdev->irq_modes & VFIO_PCI_IRQ_MODE_INTX)
> vfio_pci_disable_intx(kvm, vdev);
> - /* Permanently disable INTx */
> - pdev->irq_modes &= ~VFIO_PCI_IRQ_MODE_INTX;
> - }
>
> eventfds = (void *)msis->irq_set + sizeof(struct vfio_irq_set);
>
> @@ -162,7 +160,16 @@ static int vfio_pci_disable_msis(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_device *vdev,
> msi_set_enabled(msis->phys_state, false);
> msi_set_empty(msis->phys_state, true);
>
> - return 0;
> + /*
> + * When MSI or MSIX is disabled, this might be called when
> + * PCI driver detects the MSI interrupt failure and wants to
> + * rollback to INTx mode. Thus enable INTx if the device
> + * supports INTx mode in this case.
> + */
> + if (pdev->irq_modes & VFIO_PCI_IRQ_MODE_INTX)
> + ret = vfio_pci_enable_intx(kvm, vdev);
> +
> + return ret >= 0 ? 0 : ret;
> }
>
> static int vfio_pci_update_msi_entry(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_device *vdev,
> @@ -1002,6 +1009,10 @@ static void vfio_pci_disable_intx(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_device *vdev)
> .index = VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX,
> };
>
> + /* INTx mode has been disabled */
Here as well, the comments on intx_fd seem unnecessary. But these are
only nits, the code is fine and I tested for regressions on my hardware, so:
Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> + if (pdev->intx_fd == -1)
> + return;
> +
> pr_debug("user requested MSI, disabling INTx %d", gsi);
>
> ioctl(vdev->fd, VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS, &irq_set);
> @@ -1009,6 +1020,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_disable_intx(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_device *vdev)
>
> close(pdev->intx_fd);
> close(pdev->unmask_fd);
> + pdev->intx_fd = -1;
> }
>
> static int vfio_pci_enable_intx(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_device *vdev)
> @@ -1020,6 +1032,10 @@ static int vfio_pci_enable_intx(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_device *vdev)
> struct vfio_pci_device *pdev = &vdev->pci;
> int gsi = pdev->intx_gsi;
>
> + /* INTx mode has been enabled */
> + if (pdev->intx_fd != -1)
> + return 0;
> +
> /*
> * PCI IRQ is level-triggered, so we use two eventfds. trigger_fd
> * signals an interrupt from host to guest, and unmask_fd signals the
> @@ -1122,6 +1138,9 @@ static int vfio_pci_init_intx(struct kvm *kvm, struct vfio_device *vdev)
> /* Guest is going to ovewrite our irq_line... */
> pdev->intx_gsi = pdev->hdr.irq_line - KVM_IRQ_OFFSET;
>
> + /* Use intx_fd = -1 to denote INTx is disabled */
> + pdev->intx_fd = -1;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-04 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-26 7:41 [PATCH kvmtool v3 0/3] vfio-pci: Support INTx mode re-enabling Leo Yan
2019-03-26 7:41 ` [PATCH kvmtool v3 1/3] vfio-pci: Release INTx's unmask eventfd properly Leo Yan
2019-03-26 7:41 ` [PATCH kvmtool v3 2/3] vfio-pci: Add new function for INTx one-time initialisation Leo Yan
2019-04-04 11:06 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-03-26 7:41 ` [PATCH kvmtool v3 3/3] vfio-pci: Re-enable INTx mode when disable MSI/MSIX Leo Yan
2019-04-04 11:06 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2019-04-05 3:46 ` Leo Yan
2019-04-05 3:46 ` Leo Yan
2019-04-02 16:50 ` [PATCH kvmtool v3 0/3] vfio-pci: Support INTx mode re-enabling Will Deacon
2019-04-03 3:58 ` Leo Yan
2019-04-03 12:43 ` Will Deacon
2019-04-04 2:57 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fea39efb-1bc1-deff-e1a0-f695db429abb@arm.com \
--to=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
--cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=Robin.Murphy@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox