* kvm-unit-test failed to complete @ 2015-07-29 18:18 Shih-Wei Li 2015-07-29 18:30 ` Christoffer Dall 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Shih-Wei Li @ 2015-07-29 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kvm; +Cc: Christoffer Dall Hi all, This is Shih-Wei, I'm Christoffer's colleague at Columbia University. We have experienced some problems in running kvm-unit-tests in our environment. Here's what we did: ./configure make ./run_test.sh run_test.sh halted in some specific test items and couldn't finish the run. I managed to get it finish running after removing the following items: x86/apic.c: -> removed: test_sti_nmi(); test_multiple_nmi(); x86/unittest.cfg: -> removed: smptest, smptest3, vmexit_ipi, vmexit_ipi_halt, s3, kvmclock_test We are using the x86_64 profile (cpu: Intel Xeon E5-2450 8 cores) in CloudLab. We used Linux-4.0-rc4 as our host kernel and the upstream kvm-unit-test. It would be so much appreciated if someone could give us some hints on how to fix the problems (i.e. possible tweak on the unit-test code, configuration of our hardware, host kernel setup, etc...). Thanks! Shih-Wei ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: kvm-unit-test failed to complete 2015-07-29 18:18 kvm-unit-test failed to complete Shih-Wei Li @ 2015-07-29 18:30 ` Christoffer Dall 2015-07-29 18:38 ` Shih-Wei Li 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Christoffer Dall @ 2015-07-29 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shih-Wei Li; +Cc: kvm, Christoffer Dall Hi Shih-Wei, [Something weird happened when sending these e-mails, you sent two where one seems to be a slight modification of the other?] On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, Shih-Wei Li wrote: > Hi all, > > This is Shih-Wei, I'm Christoffer's colleague at Columbia University. > We have experienced some problems in running kvm-unit-tests in our > environment. > Here's what we did: > ./configure > make > ./run_test.sh > > run_test.sh halted in some specific test items and couldn't finish the > run. I managed to get it finish running after removing the following > items: > x86/apic.c: > -> removed: > test_sti_nmi(); > test_multiple_nmi(); I'm wondering if there's a dependency on the version of QEMU? Have you tried with the most recent upstream QEMU? -Christoffer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: kvm-unit-test failed to complete 2015-07-29 18:30 ` Christoffer Dall @ 2015-07-29 18:38 ` Shih-Wei Li 2015-07-30 1:04 ` Shih-Wei Li 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Shih-Wei Li @ 2015-07-29 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoffer Dall; +Cc: kvm, Christoffer Dall On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu> wrote: > Hi Shih-Wei, > > [Something weird happened when sending these e-mails, you sent two where > one seems to be a slight modification of the other?] yes, the previous one just got rejected by the mailing list. sorry about the spam. > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, Shih-Wei Li wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is Shih-Wei, I'm Christoffer's colleague at Columbia University. >> We have experienced some problems in running kvm-unit-tests in our >> environment. >> Here's what we did: >> ./configure >> make >> ./run_test.sh >> >> run_test.sh halted in some specific test items and couldn't finish the >> run. I managed to get it finish running after removing the following >> items: >> x86/apic.c: >> -> removed: >> test_sti_nmi(); >> test_multiple_nmi(); > > I'm wondering if there's a dependency on the version of QEMU? Have you > tried with the most recent upstream QEMU? I haven't, but I will try. We are using qemu 2.2.50 now. > > -Christoffer Shih-Wei ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: kvm-unit-test failed to complete 2015-07-29 18:38 ` Shih-Wei Li @ 2015-07-30 1:04 ` Shih-Wei Li 2015-07-30 4:41 ` Bandan Das 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Shih-Wei Li @ 2015-07-30 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoffer Dall; +Cc: kvm, Christoffer Dall On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Shih-Wei Li <shihwei@cs.columbia.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu> wrote: >> Hi Shih-Wei, >> >> [Something weird happened when sending these e-mails, you sent two where >> one seems to be a slight modification of the other?] > > yes, the previous one just got rejected by the mailing list. sorry > about the spam. > >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, Shih-Wei Li wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This is Shih-Wei, I'm Christoffer's colleague at Columbia University. >>> We have experienced some problems in running kvm-unit-tests in our >>> environment. >>> Here's what we did: >>> ./configure >>> make >>> ./run_test.sh >>> >>> run_test.sh halted in some specific test items and couldn't finish the >>> run. I managed to get it finish running after removing the following >>> items: >>> x86/apic.c: >>> -> removed: >>> test_sti_nmi(); >>> test_multiple_nmi(); >> >> I'm wondering if there's a dependency on the version of QEMU? Have you >> tried with the most recent upstream QEMU? > > I haven't, but I will try. We are using qemu 2.2.50 now. Here's the update. I just used the upstream QEMU to run kvm-unit-test, but it still failed to finish the same test items I mentioned earlier. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: kvm-unit-test failed to complete 2015-07-30 1:04 ` Shih-Wei Li @ 2015-07-30 4:41 ` Bandan Das 2015-07-30 13:32 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Bandan Das @ 2015-07-30 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shih-Wei Li, Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: Christoffer Dall, kvm, Christoffer Dall Shih-Wei Li <shihwei@cs.columbia.edu> writes: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Shih-Wei Li <shihwei@cs.columbia.edu> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu> wrote: >>> Hi Shih-Wei, >>> >>> [Something weird happened when sending these e-mails, you sent two where >>> one seems to be a slight modification of the other?] >> >> yes, the previous one just got rejected by the mailing list. sorry >> about the spam. >> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, Shih-Wei Li wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> This is Shih-Wei, I'm Christoffer's colleague at Columbia University. >>>> We have experienced some problems in running kvm-unit-tests in our >>>> environment. >>>> Here's what we did: >>>> ./configure >>>> make >>>> ./run_test.sh >>>> >>>> run_test.sh halted in some specific test items and couldn't finish the >>>> run. I managed to get it finish running after removing the following >>>> items: >>>> x86/apic.c: >>>> -> removed: >>>> test_sti_nmi(); >>>> test_multiple_nmi(); >>> >>> I'm wondering if there's a dependency on the version of QEMU? Have you >>> tried with the most recent upstream QEMU? >> >> I haven't, but I will try. We are using qemu 2.2.50 now. > > Here's the update. I just used the upstream QEMU to run kvm-unit-test, > but it still failed to finish the same test items I mentioned earlier. (Just a cursory look) It seems this commit introduced it - commit 402d4596789335f540a0697955f6dcf43e2bb796 Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Date: Thu Jul 23 09:16:45 2015 +0200 x86: load 64-bit segments into the segment registers kvm-unit-tests was keeping DS/ES/FS/GS loaded with the segment descriptors provided by the multiboot boot loader (which are 32-bit), and instead loading SS with 0. The vmx.flat test failed because KVM did not like doing writes into such an SS. Load again the segment registers after entering 64-bit mode, for both the BSP and the APs. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> diff --git a/x86/cstart64.S b/x86/cstart64.S index 8d0d95d..8d5ee2d 100644 --- a/x86/cstart64.S +++ b/x86/cstart64.S @@ -213,7 +213,11 @@ idt_descr: load_tss: lidtq idt_descr - mov $0, %eax + mov $0x10, %eax + mov %ax, %ds + mov %ax, %es + mov %ax, %fs + mov %ax, %gs mov %ax, %ss mov $(APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE + APIC_ID), %eax mov (%rax), %eax Paolo, what is the purpose of initializing %gs and %fs ? It seems if I comment out "mov %ax, %gs", the test works. handle_irq() does seem to trigger but the handler doesn't seem to get called if %gs is initialized. Weird. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: kvm-unit-test failed to complete 2015-07-30 4:41 ` Bandan Das @ 2015-07-30 13:32 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2015-07-30 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bandan Das, Shih-Wei Li; +Cc: Christoffer Dall, kvm, Christoffer Dall On 30/07/2015 06:41, Bandan Das wrote: > > diff --git a/x86/cstart64.S b/x86/cstart64.S > index 8d0d95d..8d5ee2d 100644 > --- a/x86/cstart64.S > +++ b/x86/cstart64.S > @@ -213,7 +213,11 @@ idt_descr: > > load_tss: > lidtq idt_descr > - mov $0, %eax > + mov $0x10, %eax > + mov %ax, %ds > + mov %ax, %es > + mov %ax, %fs > + mov %ax, %gs > mov %ax, %ss > mov $(APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE + APIC_ID), %eax > mov (%rax), %eax > > Paolo, what is the purpose of initializing %gs and %fs ? It seems if I comment > out "mov %ax, %gs", the test works. Oh, you're right! setup_percpu_area writes the GS base. Also the 0x10 selector is the same between the 32-bit and 64-bit GDT, so it should be okay to remove the whole sequence of moves (from mov $0, %eax to mov %ax, %ss). Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-30 13:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-07-29 18:18 kvm-unit-test failed to complete Shih-Wei Li 2015-07-29 18:30 ` Christoffer Dall 2015-07-29 18:38 ` Shih-Wei Li 2015-07-30 1:04 ` Shih-Wei Li 2015-07-30 4:41 ` Bandan Das 2015-07-30 13:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox