From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jia Jia" <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 14:39:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-166650@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010142247.99223-2-physicalmtea@gmail.com>
> Split virtio_transport_recv_pkt() so socket lookup is separate from the
> receive state machine that runs under the socket lock.
>
> Keep virtio_transport_recv_pkt() on its existing per-packet locking path.
> Pass the source and destination addresses used for lookup to the locked
> receive path so they are decoded only once.
>
> Pass the network namespace and decoded address tuple through a packet
> context to the locked receive path.
>
> Preserve source validation and failure handling. Keep the lookup reference
> separate from the skb owner reference so the locked receive path can manage
> the two lifetimes independently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261010142247.99223-1-physicalmtea@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-10 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 14:22 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 21:34 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:24 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-12 22:02 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:26 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 22:15 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:28 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] vsock/virtio: reuse same-flow socket lookup in RX batches Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:17 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:30 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] vsock/virtio: coalesce RX write-space notifications in lock batches Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] vsock/virtio: defer RX readable notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 5:51 ` Jia Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-166650@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox