From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jia Jia" <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] vsock/virtio: coalesce RX write-space notifications in lock batches
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 14:39:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-166654@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010142247.99223-5-physicalmtea@gmail.com>
> Each received packet updates peer credit and calls sk_write_space() when
> send space is available. A writer cannot use the newly advertised credit
> until the socket lock is released, so repeated callbacks within one lock
> batch cannot let it make progress sooner.
>
> For the callback installed by sock_init_data(), record one pending
> write-space notification and deliver it through the saved default callback
> before release_sock(). If the callback has been replaced by batch finish,
> invoke the replacement as well. This keeps the native writer wakeup from
> being lost across a sockmap callback change while still notifying sockmap.
>
> Save the initial sock_def_write_space() callback when the AF_VSOCK socket
> is created because it is not visible to virtio_transport_common when built
> as a module. The fast path uses READ_ONCE() and adds no callback lock.
>
> Set the batch socket before processing its first packet so a batch ending
> on that packet cannot lose the notification.
>
> Packets outside the eligible STREAM/RW batch path retain per-packet
> notification behavior. The 64-packet and 64K limits cap the packets whose
> notifications can be coalesced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261010142247.99223-1-physicalmtea@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-10 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 14:22 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 21:34 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:24 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-12 22:02 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:26 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 22:15 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:28 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] vsock/virtio: reuse same-flow socket lookup in RX batches Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:17 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:30 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] vsock/virtio: coalesce RX write-space notifications in lock batches Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] vsock/virtio: defer RX readable notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 5:51 ` Jia Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-166654@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox