From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tarun Sahu" <tarunsahu@google.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
joro@8bytes.org, "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
maz@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
"David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
jgg@nvidia.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, loganodell@google.com,
oupton@kernel.org, kevin.tian@intel.com, alex@shazbot.org,
dwmw2@infradead.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
will@kernel.org, "Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
"Alexander Graf" <graf@amazon.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Cc: sagis@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
skhawaja@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] mm: memfd_luo: Add the 2-bit pair feature header
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 15:26:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-181698@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021152527.375070-5-tarunsahu@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] mm: memfd_luo: missing feature header validation in memfd_luo_finish()
--
commit b960724786ac11078fdfa9ded6bcd2355170cf0b
Author: Tarun Sahu <tarunsahu@google.com>
mm: memfd_luo: Add the 2-bit pair feature header
This commit embeds a 128-byte struct luo_feature_hdr at the start of struct
memfd_luo_ser and defines enum memfd_luo_feature with MEMFD_LUO_FEAT_CORE as
a required feature. It initializes the feature header during
memfd_luo_preserve() and validates it during memfd_luo_retrieve().
> diff --git a/mm/memfd_luo.c b/mm/memfd_luo.c
> index 64f8b8cb75bdb..ea1f4c8cd2591 100644
> --- a/mm/memfd_luo.c
> +++ b/mm/memfd_luo.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -525,6 +531,14 @@ static int memfd_luo_retrieve(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
> if (!ser)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + err = luo_feature_hdr_validate(&ser->features, memfd_luo_features);
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("memfd_luo_ser feature header validation failed (size=%llu, flags[0]=%#llx): %pe\n",
> + ser->features.size, ser->features.flags[0],
> + ERR_PTR(err));
> + goto free_ser;
> + }
> +
> /* Make sure the file only has seals supported by this version. */
> if (ser->seals & ~MEMFD_LUO_ALL_SEALS) {
> err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
[Severity: Medium]
Here in memfd_luo_retrieve(), ser->features is validated via
luo_feature_hdr_validate() before accessing any MEMFD_LUO_FEAT_CORE fields,
jumping directly to kho_restore_free(ser) on failure.
However, when a preserved memfd is not retrieved in the target kernel before
the session is finished or closed (for example via luo_session_release() ->
luo_session_finish_one() -> luo_file_finish() -> luo_file_finish_one() ->
memfd_luo_finish() with args->retrieve_status == 0), memfd_luo_finish()
reads ser->nr_folios and ser->folios without validating ser->features first:
mm/memfd_luo.c:memfd_luo_finish() {
if (args->retrieve_status)
return;
ser = phys_to_virt(args->serialized_data);
if (!ser)
return;
if (ser->nr_folios) {
folios_ser = kho_restore_vmalloc(&ser->folios);
if (!folios_ser)
goto out;
memfd_luo_discard_folios(folios_ser, ser->nr_folios);
vfree(folios_ser);
}
out:
kho_restore_free(ser);
}
According to the ABI contract in include/linux/kho/abi/memfd.h, fields of a
LUO_FEAT_REQUIRED feature such as nr_folios and folios are only guaranteed
present once luo_feature_hdr_validate() succeeds.
Should memfd_luo_finish() also call luo_feature_hdr_validate(&ser->features,
memfd_luo_features) and skip to kho_restore_free(ser) if validation fails,
so it does not pass unvalidated MEMFD_LUO_FEAT_CORE fields to
kho_restore_vmalloc() and memfd_luo_discard_folios()?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261021152527.375070-1-tarunsahu@google.com?part=4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 15:25 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] liveupdate: Feature header ABI and named handler Tarun Sahu
2026-10-21 15:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] liveupdate: Rename handler compatible to name Tarun Sahu
2026-10-21 17:11 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 18:16 ` tarunsahu
2026-10-21 19:11 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 19:35 ` tarunsahu
2026-10-23 7:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-10-21 15:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] liveupdate: Select file handler by name in the preserve ioctl Tarun Sahu
2026-10-21 17:17 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 23:02 ` David Matlack
2026-10-22 1:14 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22 17:57 ` David Matlack
2026-10-22 12:50 ` tarunsahu
2026-10-22 13:42 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 15:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] liveupdate: Replace compatibility string with a 2-bit pair feature header Tarun Sahu
2026-10-21 17:27 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 17:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 17:55 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 18:40 ` tarunsahu
2026-10-21 18:46 ` David Matlack
2026-10-21 18:50 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 23:28 ` David Matlack
2026-10-22 1:26 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22 2:57 ` David Matlack
2026-10-22 3:32 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22 3:52 ` David Matlack
2026-10-22 4:11 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22 17:51 ` David Matlack
2026-10-22 20:53 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 23:55 ` David Matlack
2026-10-22 0:04 ` David Matlack
2026-10-21 15:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] mm: memfd_luo: Add the " Tarun Sahu
2026-10-21 17:38 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-21 23:18 ` David Matlack
2026-10-22 0:41 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22 2:51 ` David Matlack
2026-10-22 3:50 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-10-22 15:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-181698@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loganodell@google.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=tarunsahu@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox