From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: remove one useless check extension
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 14:21:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150505122154.GD19385@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55473AC6.6020206@redhat.com>
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:24:22AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 04/05/2015 04:48, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> > We already check KVM_CAP_IRQFD in generic once enable CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD,
> >
> > kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic()
> > |
> > + switch (arg) {
> > + ...
> > + #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
> > + case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
> > + #endif
> > + ...
> > + return 1;
> > + ...
> > + }
> > |
> > + kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension()
> >
> > So its not necessary to check this in arch again, and also fix one typo,
> > s/emlation/emulation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 1 -
> > include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> > index d9631ec..483b5d1 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> > @@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> > int r;
> > switch (ext) {
> > case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP:
> > - case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
> > case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD:
> > case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL:
> > case KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> > index 4b60056..2fa7302 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> > @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ struct kvm_xen_hvm_config {
> > *
> > * KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE indicates resamplefd is valid and specifies
> > * the irqfd to operate in resampling mode for level triggered interrupt
> > - * emlation. See Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt.
> > + * emulation. See Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt.
> > */
> > #define KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE (1 << 1)
> >
> >
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> Christoffer/Marc, please apply to the ARM tree in order to avoid
> pointless conflicts in kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension.
>
Applied, thanks.
-Christoffer
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1430707729-8175-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
2015-05-04 9:24 ` [PATCH] kvm: remove one useless check extension Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 12:21 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150505122154.GD19385@cbox \
--to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox