From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: remove one useless check extension
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 11:24:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55473AC6.6020206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430707729-8175-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
On 04/05/2015 04:48, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> We already check KVM_CAP_IRQFD in generic once enable CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD,
>
> kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic()
> |
> + switch (arg) {
> + ...
> + #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
> + case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
> + #endif
> + ...
> + return 1;
> + ...
> + }
> |
> + kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension()
>
> So its not necessary to check this in arch again, and also fix one typo,
> s/emlation/emulation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 1 -
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index d9631ec..483b5d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> int r;
> switch (ext) {
> case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP:
> - case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
> case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD:
> case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL:
> case KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 4b60056..2fa7302 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ struct kvm_xen_hvm_config {
> *
> * KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE indicates resamplefd is valid and specifies
> * the irqfd to operate in resampling mode for level triggered interrupt
> - * emlation. See Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt.
> + * emulation. See Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt.
> */
> #define KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE (1 << 1)
>
>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Christoffer/Marc, please apply to the ARM tree in order to avoid
pointless conflicts in kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension.
Paolo
next parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1430707729-8175-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
2015-05-04 9:24 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-05-05 12:21 ` [PATCH] kvm: remove one useless check extension Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55473AC6.6020206@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox