From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2 12/19] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Get rid of the lpi_list_lock
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 22:38:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240419223842.951452-13-oliver.upton@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240419223842.951452-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
The last genuine use case for the lpi_list_lock was the global LPI
translation cache, which has been removed in favor of a per-ITS xarray.
Remove a layer from the locking puzzle by getting rid of it.
vgic_add_lpi() still has a critical section that needs to protect
against the insertion of other LPIs; change it to take the LPI xarray's
xa_lock to retain this property.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 1 -
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 17 ++++++-----------
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c | 5 ++---
include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 3 ---
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index 6ee42f395253..aee6083d0da6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ void kvm_vgic_early_init(struct kvm *kvm)
{
struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
- raw_spin_lock_init(&dist->lpi_list_lock);
xa_init_flags(&dist->lpi_xa, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index f0287414fa75..be364a8d14a6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid,
irq->target_vcpu = vcpu;
irq->group = 1;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
+ xa_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_xa, flags);
/*
* There could be a race with another vgic_add_lpi(), so we need to
@@ -84,14 +84,14 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid,
goto out_unlock;
}
- ret = xa_err(xa_store(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq, 0));
+ ret = xa_err(__xa_store(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq, 0));
if (ret) {
xa_release(&dist->lpi_xa, intid);
kfree(irq);
}
out_unlock:
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
+ xa_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_xa, flags);
if (ret)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
@@ -543,11 +543,8 @@ static struct vgic_irq *__vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db,
static struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db,
u32 devid, u32 eventid)
{
- struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
struct vgic_irq *irq;
- unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
rcu_read_lock();
irq = __vgic_its_check_cache(kvm, db, devid, eventid);
@@ -555,7 +552,6 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db,
irq = NULL;
rcu_read_unlock();
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
return irq;
}
@@ -565,7 +561,6 @@ static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
struct vgic_irq *irq)
{
unsigned long cache_key = vgic_its_cache_key(devid, eventid);
- struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
unsigned long flags;
phys_addr_t db;
@@ -576,7 +571,7 @@ static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
if (xa_reserve_irq(&its->translation_cache, cache_key, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT))
return;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
+ xa_lock_irqsave(&its->translation_cache, flags);
rcu_read_lock();
/*
@@ -595,10 +590,10 @@ static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
lockdep_assert_held(&its->its_lock);
vgic_get_irq_kref(irq);
- xa_store(&its->translation_cache, cache_key, irq, 0);
+ __xa_store(&its->translation_cache, cache_key, irq, 0);
out:
rcu_read_unlock();
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
+ xa_unlock_irqrestore(&its->translation_cache, flags);
}
static void vgic_its_invalidate_cache(struct vgic_its *its)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
index e3ee1bc1214a..d0c59b51a6b0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -29,9 +29,8 @@ struct vgic_global kvm_vgic_global_state __ro_after_init = {
* its->cmd_lock (mutex)
* its->its_lock (mutex)
* vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled
- * kvm->lpi_list_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled
- * vgic_dist->lpi_xa.xa_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled
- * vgic_irq->irq_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled
+ * vgic_dist->lpi_xa.xa_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled
+ * vgic_irq->irq_lock must be taken with IRQs disabled
*
* As the ap_list_lock might be taken from the timer interrupt handler,
* we have to disable IRQs before taking this lock and everything lower
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 276082db9ae6..493b1f1c6bf7 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -280,9 +280,6 @@ struct vgic_dist {
*/
u64 propbaser;
- /* Protects the lpi_list. */
- raw_spinlock_t lpi_list_lock;
-
#define LPI_XA_MARK_DEBUG_ITER XA_MARK_0
struct xarray lpi_xa;
--
2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 22:38 [PATCH v2 00/19] KVM: arm64: Transition to a per-ITS translation cache Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] KVM: Treat the device list as an rculist Oliver Upton
2024-04-22 18:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-22 18:35 ` Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Walk LPI xarray in its_sync_lpi_pending_table() Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Walk LPI xarray in vgic_its_invall() Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Walk LPI xarray in vgic_its_cmd_handle_movall() Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] KVM: arm64: vgic-debug: Use an xarray mark for debug iterator Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Get rid of vgic_copy_lpi_list() Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Scope translation cache invalidations to an ITS Oliver Upton
2024-04-21 9:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-21 16:30 ` Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Spin off helper for finding ITS by doorbell addr Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Maintain a translation cache per ITS Oliver Upton
2024-04-20 19:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-21 7:28 ` Oliver Upton
2024-04-21 10:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-21 17:03 ` Oliver Upton
2024-04-21 19:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-21 20:58 ` Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Use the per-ITS translation cache for injection Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Rip out the global translation cache Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] KVM: selftests: Align with kernel's GIC definitions Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] KVM: selftests: Standardise layout of GIC frames Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] KVM: selftests: Add quadword MMIO accessors Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] KVM: selftests: Add a minimal library for interacting with an ITS Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] KVM: selftests: Add helper for enabling LPIs on a redistributor Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] KVM: selftests: Use MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK from cputype.h Oliver Upton
2024-04-19 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] KVM: selftests: Add stress test for LPI injection Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240419223842.951452-13-oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox