Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Fuad Tabba" <tabba@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] KVM: arm64: Implement lazy vCPU state sync for non-protected guests
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 07:24:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260619072432.80E331F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260619070508.802802-9-tabba@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Removal of `hcr_el2` sync-back causes infinite virtual SError injections.
- [High] Injected exceptions for Illegal Execution State (ARM_EXCEPTION_IL) are silently dropped on re-entry.
- [High] Asynchronous guest context modifications (e.g., KVM_REQ_VCPU_RESET via PSCI CPU_ON) are dropped, ignoring resets.
--

commit 479bc386009beb82e67cb9e9a04495d0872f077c
Author: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>

KVM: arm64: Implement lazy vCPU state sync for non-protected guests

This commit defers copying a non-protected guest's register context
between the host and hypervisor until the host explicitly needs it or
modifies it. It introduces the PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY flag to track when
the state must be flushed to the hypervisor on guest entry.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -489,6 +503,22 @@ int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int exception_index)
>  /* For exit types that need handling before we can be preempted */
>  void handle_exit_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int exception_index)
>  {
> +	bool inject_serror = ARM_SERROR_PENDING(exception_index) ||
> +		ARM_EXCEPTION_CODE(exception_index) == ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * An SError injected below writes the host ctxt; for a non-protected
> +	 * guest, sync from the hyp vCPU and keep it dirty so it isn't dropped.
> +	 */
> +	if (is_protected_kvm_enabled()) {
> +		vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY);

[Severity: High]
Does unconditionally clearing the dirty flag here cause other injected
exceptions or asynchronous state changes to be silently dropped on the next
guest entry?

For instance, when a non-protected guest exits with an illegal execution
state (ARM_EXCEPTION_IL), handle_exit_early() clears PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY.
Later, handle_exit() processes the exception by calling
kvm_inject_undefined(), which modifies the host's copy of the guest register
context (vcpu->arch.ctxt) to deliver an UNDEF exception. Because this happens
outside of handle_trap_exceptions(), the dirty flag is never set back to 1.
Consequently, on the next entry, flush_hyp_vcpu() skips syncing the modified
context, and the guest resumes execution with its previous state instead of
taking the UNDEF exception, leading to an infinite trap loop.

Similarly, if a PSCI CPU_ON call triggers an IPI, the target vCPU exits with
ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ, and the dirty flag is cleared here. The run loop then
processes pending requests via check_vcpu_requests(), handling
KVM_REQ_VCPU_RESET by calling kvm_reset_vcpu(). The host's context is reset,
but since the dirty flag remains 0, the next entry skips syncing the reset
context to the hypervisor, causing the PSCI wake/reset request to be ignored.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -203,9 +255,13 @@ static void sync_hyp_vcpu(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu)
>  	fpsimd_sve_sync(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu);
>  	sync_debug_state(hyp_vcpu);
>  
> -	host_vcpu->arch.ctxt		= hyp_vcpu->vcpu.arch.ctxt;
> -
> -	host_vcpu->arch.hcr_el2		= hyp_vcpu->vcpu.arch.hcr_el2;

[Severity: Critical]
Does removing the synchronization of arch.hcr_el2 back to the host cause an
infinite loop of virtual SError injections?

The host uses HCR_VSE to inject a virtual SError. When the guest takes the
exception, the hardware clears the physical HCR_EL2.VSE bit, which is saved in
the hyp vCPU's context on exit. Because this sync-back assignment is removed,
host_vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 indefinitely retains the stale HCR_VSE bit set to 1.

On every subsequent guest entry, flush_hyp_vcpu() will re-apply this stale
bit from the host into the hyp context, causing infinite, spurious virtual
SError injections that will hang or crash the guest.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260619070508.802802-1-tabba@google.com?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-19  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-19  7:05 [PATCH 0/8] KVM: arm64: Rework pKVM vCPU state synchronisation Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:05 ` [PATCH 1/8] KVM: arm64: Extract MPIDR computation into a shared header Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:05 ` [PATCH 2/8] KVM: arm64: Make vcpu_{read,write}_sys_reg available to HYP code Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:05 ` [PATCH 3/8] KVM: arm64: Factor out reusable vCPU reset helpers Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:05 ` [PATCH 4/8] KVM: arm64: Move PSCI helper functions to a shared header Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19  7:24     ` Fuad Tabba
2026-06-26  7:19       ` Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:05 ` [PATCH 5/8] KVM: arm64: Add host and hypervisor vCPU lookup primitives Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:05 ` [PATCH 6/8] KVM: arm64: Minimise EL2's exposure of host VGIC state during world switch Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-19  7:29     ` Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:05 ` [PATCH 7/8] KVM: arm64: Add primitives to flush/sync the VGIC state at EL2 Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:05 ` [PATCH 8/8] KVM: arm64: Implement lazy vCPU state sync for non-protected guests Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:24   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-19  7:55     ` Fuad Tabba
2026-06-19  7:06 ` [PATCH 0/8] KVM: arm64: Rework pKVM vCPU state synchronisation Fuad Tabba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260619072432.80E331F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox