From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: andrew.murray@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, julien.thierry@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: arm/arm64: re-create event when setting counter value
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:28:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3adc7d31-9d5a-d66b-21ee-9b4da986d24f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549299218-44714-4-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com>
Hi Andrew,
On 04/02/2019 16:53, Andrew Murray wrote:
> The perf event sample_period is currently set based upon the current
> counter value, when PMXEVTYPER is written to and the perf event is created.
> However the user may choose to write the type before the counter value in
> which case sample_period will be set incorrectly. Let's instead decouple
> event creation from PMXEVTYPER and (re)create the event in either
> suitation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index 6e7c179..95d74ec 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <kvm/arm_pmu.h>
> #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
>
> +static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx);
> /**
> * kvm_pmu_get_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> @@ -62,6 +63,9 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val)
> reg = (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + select_idx;
> __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) += (s64)val - kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(vcpu, select_idx);
> +
> + /* Recreate the perf event to reflect the updated sample_period */
> + kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, select_idx);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -378,23 +382,22 @@ static bool kvm_pmu_counter_is_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> }
>
> /**
> - * kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type - set selected counter to monitor some event
> + * kvm_pmu_create_perf_event - create a perf event for a counter
> * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> - * @data: The data guest writes to PMXEVTYPER_EL0
> + * @data: Type of event as per PMXEVTYPER_EL0 format
> * @select_idx: The number of selected counter
nit: data no longer exists.
> - *
> - * When OS accesses PMXEVTYPER_EL0, that means it wants to set a PMC to count an
> - * event with given hardware event number. Here we call perf_event API to
> - * emulate this action and create a kernel perf event for it.
> */
> -void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
> - u64 select_idx)
> +static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> {
With the comment from Julien addressed,
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulse@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-13 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-04 16:53 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: arm/arm64: add support for chained counters Andrew Murray
2019-02-04 16:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: arm/arm64: rename kvm_pmu_{enable/disable}_counter functions Andrew Murray
2019-02-05 12:21 ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-11 17:23 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-02-04 16:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: arm/arm64: extract duplicated code to own function Andrew Murray
2019-02-04 16:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: arm/arm64: re-create event when setting counter value Andrew Murray
2019-02-05 12:21 ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-05 12:27 ` Andrew Murray
2019-02-13 14:28 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2019-02-18 9:39 ` Andrew Murray
2019-02-04 16:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: arm/arm64: lazily create perf events on enable Andrew Murray
2019-02-14 11:36 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-02-18 9:57 ` Andrew Murray
2019-02-04 16:53 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: support chained PMU counters Andrew Murray
2019-02-05 14:33 ` Julien Thierry
2019-02-14 11:42 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-02-18 12:03 ` Andrew Murray
2019-02-18 14:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-18 10:11 ` Andrew Murray
2019-02-18 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: arm/arm64: add support for chained counters Marc Zyngier
2019-02-18 12:10 ` Andrew Murray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3adc7d31-9d5a-d66b-21ee-9b4da986d24f@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox