From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: cdall@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm/arm64: tidy 'should sleep' conditions
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:13:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71ec93c5-8feb-3862-7f17-2ccc16fe04d0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170929113041.24371-2-drjones@redhat.com>
On 29/09/17 12:30, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Introduce vcpu_should_sleep() in order to tidy several places up
> that the compound 'power_off || pause' condition is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index b9f68e4add71..e4bec508ee5b 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -403,17 +403,22 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool vcpu_should_sleep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return vcpu->arch.power_off || vcpu->arch.pause;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable - determine if the vcpu can be scheduled
> - * @v: The VCPU pointer
> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> *
> * If the guest CPU is not waiting for interrupts or an interrupt line is
> * asserted, the CPU is by definition runnable.
> */
> -int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> +int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - return ((!!v->arch.irq_lines || kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(v))
> - && !v->arch.power_off && !v->arch.pause);
> + return (!!vcpu->arch.irq_lines || kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(vcpu))
> + && !vcpu_should_sleep(vcpu);
> }
>
> bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -570,10 +575,9 @@ static void vcpu_req_sleep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct swait_queue_head *wq = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu);
>
> - swait_event_interruptible(*wq, ((!vcpu->arch.power_off) &&
> - (!vcpu->arch.pause)));
> + swait_event_interruptible(*wq, !vcpu_should_sleep(vcpu));
>
> - if (vcpu->arch.power_off || vcpu->arch.pause) {
> + if (vcpu_should_sleep(vcpu)) {
> /* Awaken to handle a signal, request we sleep again later. */
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu);
> }
>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-05 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-29 11:30 [PATCH 0/5] kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable related improvements Andrew Jones
2017-09-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm/arm64: tidy 'should sleep' conditions Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 8:13 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2017-09-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm/arm64: replace power_off with mp_state=STOPPED Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 8:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-10 13:26 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-14 19:12 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 12:04 ` Andrew Jones
2017-09-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm/arm64: factor out common wfe/wfi emulation code Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-14 19:13 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 12:06 ` Andrew Jones
2017-09-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm/arm64: improve kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 9:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-14 19:13 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 12:09 ` Andrew Jones
2017-09-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable: don't miss injected irqs Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 9:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-10 13:28 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-14 19:13 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 12:13 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-18 13:18 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 13:55 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-18 14:14 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-02 8:31 ` [PATCH 6/5] KVM: arm/arm64: make kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq static Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 9:37 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71ec93c5-8feb-3862-7f17-2ccc16fe04d0@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox