From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: cdall@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm/arm64: factor out common wfe/wfi emulation code
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:36:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e88757c2-864b-3d23-0d99-e7250d21688f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170929113041.24371-4-drjones@redhat.com>
On 29/09/17 12:30, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Before we add more common code to the wfi emulation, let's first
> factor out everything common.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c | 14 +++++---------
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 14 +++++---------
> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/psci.c | 15 +++++++--------
> 6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 85f3c20b9759..964320825372 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -231,6 +231,8 @@ void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_on(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_arm_halt_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
> void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
> +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> int kvm_arm_copy_coproc_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices);
> unsigned long kvm_arm_num_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index cf8bf6bf87c4..e40466577c87 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -57,22 +57,18 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> * @run: the kvm_run structure pointer
> *
> * WFE: Yield the CPU and come back to this vcpu when the scheduler
> - * decides to.
> - * WFI: Simply call kvm_vcpu_block(), which will halt execution of
> - * world-switches and schedule other host processes until there is an
> - * incoming IRQ or FIQ to the VM.
> + * decides to.
> + * WFI: Halt execution of world-switches and schedule other host
> + * processes until there is an incoming IRQ or FIQ to the VM.
> */
> static int kvm_handle_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> {
> if (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & HSR_WFI_IS_WFE) {
> trace_kvm_wfx(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), true);
> - vcpu->stat.wfe_exit_stat++;
> - kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu));
> + kvm_arm_emulate_wfe(vcpu);
> } else {
> trace_kvm_wfx(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), false);
> - vcpu->stat.wfi_exit_stat++;
> - kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> - kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu);
> + kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(vcpu);
> }
>
> kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 25545a87de11..a774f6b30474 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_on(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_arm_halt_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
> void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm);
> +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> u64 __kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...);
> #define kvm_call_hyp(f, ...) __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 7debb74843a0..7ba50a296d10 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -74,22 +74,18 @@ static int handle_no_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> * @vcpu: the vcpu pointer
> *
> * WFE: Yield the CPU and come back to this vcpu when the scheduler
> - * decides to.
> - * WFI: Simply call kvm_vcpu_block(), which will halt execution of
> - * world-switches and schedule other host processes until there is an
> - * incoming IRQ or FIQ to the VM.
> + * decides to.
> + * WFI: Halt execution of world-switches and schedule other host
> + * processes until there is an incoming IRQ or FIQ to the VM.
> */
> static int kvm_handle_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> {
> if (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE) {
> trace_kvm_wfx_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), true);
> - vcpu->stat.wfe_exit_stat++;
> - kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu));
> + kvm_arm_emulate_wfe(vcpu);
> } else {
> trace_kvm_wfx_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), false);
> - vcpu->stat.wfi_exit_stat++;
> - kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> - kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu);
> + kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(vcpu);
> }
>
> kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 954e77608d29..220a3dbda76c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -573,6 +573,19 @@ void kvm_arm_resume_guest(struct kvm *kvm)
> }
> }
>
> +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + vcpu->stat.wfe_exit_stat++;
> + kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu));
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + vcpu->stat.wfi_exit_stat++;
> + kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> + kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu);
> +}
> +
> static void vcpu_req_sleep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct swait_queue_head *wq = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c b/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> index a7bf152f1247..755c415304ea 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> @@ -50,20 +50,19 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_suspend(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * This means for KVM the wakeup events are interrupts and
> * this is consistent with intended use of StateID as described
> * in section 5.4.1 of PSCI v0.2 specification (ARM DEN 0022A).
> - *
> - * Further, we also treat power-down request to be same as
> - * stand-by request as-per section 5.4.2 clause 3 of PSCI v0.2
> - * specification (ARM DEN 0022A). This means all suspend states
> - * for KVM will preserve the register state.
> */
> - kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> - kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu);
> -
> + kvm_arm_emulate_wfi(vcpu);
> return PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
> }
>
> static void kvm_psci_vcpu_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + /*
> + * We treat a power-off request the same as a stand-by request,
> + * as-per section 5.4.2 clause 3 of PSCI v0.2* specification
> + * (ARM DEN 0022A). This means all suspend states for KVM will
> + * preserve the register state.
> + */
> kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
> }
>
>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-05 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-29 11:30 [PATCH 0/5] kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable related improvements Andrew Jones
2017-09-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm/arm64: tidy 'should sleep' conditions Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 8:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-09-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm/arm64: replace power_off with mp_state=STOPPED Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 8:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-10 13:26 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-14 19:12 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 12:04 ` Andrew Jones
2017-09-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm/arm64: factor out common wfe/wfi emulation code Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2017-10-14 19:13 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 12:06 ` Andrew Jones
2017-09-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm/arm64: improve kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 9:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-14 19:13 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 12:09 ` Andrew Jones
2017-09-29 11:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable: don't miss injected irqs Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 9:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-10 13:28 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-14 19:13 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 12:13 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-18 13:18 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-18 13:55 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-18 14:14 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-02 8:31 ` [PATCH 6/5] KVM: arm/arm64: make kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq static Andrew Jones
2017-10-05 9:37 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e88757c2-864b-3d23-0d99-e7250d21688f@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox