From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
andrew.jones@linux.dev, dmatlack@google.com,
shan.gavin@gmail.com, bgardon@google.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
pbonzini@redhat.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, ajones@ventanamicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] KVM: Support dirty ring in conjunction with bitmap
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:33:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <861qqfq9s2.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec281dc5-baa2-3e18-8e83-089322db551a@redhat.com>
On Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:45:34 +0000,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc, Peter, Oliver and Sean,
>
> On 11/5/22 7:40 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > ARM64 needs to dirty memory outside of a VCPU context when VGIC/ITS is
> > enabled. It's conflicting with that ring-based dirty page tracking always
> > requires a running VCPU context.
> >
> > Introduce a new flavor of dirty ring that requires the use of both VCPU
> > dirty rings and a dirty bitmap. The expectation is that for non-VCPU
> > sources of dirty memory (such as the VGIC/ITS on arm64), KVM writes to
> > the dirty bitmap. Userspace should scan the dirty bitmap before migrating
> > the VM to the target.
> >
> > Use an additional capability to advertise this behavior. The newly added
> > capability (KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP) can't be enabled before
> > KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL on ARM64. In this way, the newly added
> > capability is treated as an extension of KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> > Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> > Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 33 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> > include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h | 7 +++++
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> > include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
> > virt/kvm/Kconfig | 8 ++++++
> > virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c | 10 +++++++
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 7 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > index eee9f857a986..2ec32bd41792 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > @@ -8003,13 +8003,6 @@ flushing is done by the KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl). To achieve that, one
> > needs to kick the vcpu out of KVM_RUN using a signal. The resulting
> > vmexit ensures that all dirty GFNs are flushed to the dirty rings.
> > -NOTE: the capability KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING and the corresponding
> > -ioctl KVM_RESET_DIRTY_RINGS are mutual exclusive to the existing ioctls
> > -KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG and KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG. After enabling
> > -KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING with an acceptable dirty ring size, the virtual
> > -machine will switch to ring-buffer dirty page tracking and further
> > -KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG or KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG ioctls will fail.
> > -
> > NOTE: KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL is the only capability that
> > should be exposed by weakly ordered architecture, in order to indicate
> > the additional memory ordering requirements imposed on userspace when
> > @@ -8018,6 +8011,32 @@ Architecture with TSO-like ordering (such as x86) are allowed to
> > expose both KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING and KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL
> > to userspace.
> > +After using the dirty rings, the userspace needs to detect the
> > capability
> > +of KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP to see whether the ring structures
> > +need to be backed by per-slot bitmaps. With this capability advertised
> > +and supported, it means the architecture can dirty guest pages without
> > +vcpu/ring context, so that some of the dirty information will still be
> > +maintained in the bitmap structure. KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP
> > +can't be enabled until the capability of KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL
> > +has been enabled.
> > +
> > +Note that the bitmap here is only a backup of the ring structure, and
> > +normally should only contain a very small amount of dirty pages, which
> > +needs to be transferred during VM downtime. Collecting the dirty bitmap
> > +should be the very last thing that the VMM does before transmitting state
> > +to the target VM. VMM needs to ensure that the dirty state is final and
> > +avoid missing dirty pages from another ioctl ordered after the bitmap
> > +collection.
> > +
> > +To collect dirty bits in the backup bitmap, the userspace can use the
> > +same KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl. KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG shouldn't be needed
> > +and its behavior is undefined since collecting the dirty bitmap always
> > +happens in the last phase of VM's migration.
> > +
> > +NOTE: One example of using the backup bitmap is saving arm64 vgic/its
> > +tables through KVM_DEV_ARM_{VGIC_GRP_CTRL, ITS_SAVE_TABLES} command on
> > +KVM device "kvm-arm-vgic-its" during VM's migration.
> > +
>
> In order to speed up the review and reduce unnecessary respins. After
> collecting comments on PATCH[v8 3/7] from Marc and Peter, I would change
> above description as below. Could you please confirm it looks good to you?
>
> In the 4th paragraph, the words starting from "Collecting the dirty bitmap..."
> to the end, was previously suggested by Oliver, even Marc suggested to avoid
> mentioning "migration".
>
> After enabling the dirty rings, the userspace needs to detect the
> capability of KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP to see whether the ring
> structures need to be backed by per-slot bitmaps. With this capability
s/need/can/. If there was a *need*, it should happen automatically
without user intervention.
> advertised, it means the architecture can dirty guest pages without
> vcpu/ring context, so that some of the dirty information will still be
> maintained in the bitmap structure. KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP
> can't be enabled if the capability of KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL
> hasn't been enabled, or any memslot has been existing.
>
> Note that the bitmap here is only a backup of the ring structure. The
> use of the ring and bitmap combination is only beneficial if there is
> only a very small amount of memory that is dirtied out of vcpu/ring
> context. Otherwise, the stand-alone per-slot bitmap mechanism needs to
> be considered.
>
> To collect dirty bits in the backup bitmap, userspace can use the same
> KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl. KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG isn't needed as long as all
> the generation of the dirty bits is done in a single pass. Collecting
> the dirty bitmap should be the very last thing that the VMM does before
> transmitting state to the target VM. VMM needs to ensure that the dirty
> state is final and avoid missing dirty pages from another ioctl ordered
> after the bitmap collection.
I would replace "transmitting state to the target VM" with
"considering the state as complete", as I still object to casting this
API into the migration mold. People use this stuff more far more than
migration (checkpointing, for example).
>
> NOTE: One example of using the backup bitmap is saving arm64 vgic/its
> tables through KVM_DEV_ARM_{VGIC_GRP_CTRL, ITS_SAVE_TABLES} command on
> KVM device "kvm-arm-vgic-its" during VM's migration.
Same remark about migration.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev, will@kernel.org,
shan.gavin@gmail.com, bgardon@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, ajones@ventanamicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] KVM: Support dirty ring in conjunction with bitmap
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:33:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <861qqfq9s2.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20221107113317.6QIbiDQzGzix19_avBdlvxgpkZuvFPz5_3fqnflz-9s@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec281dc5-baa2-3e18-8e83-089322db551a@redhat.com>
On Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:45:34 +0000,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc, Peter, Oliver and Sean,
>
> On 11/5/22 7:40 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > ARM64 needs to dirty memory outside of a VCPU context when VGIC/ITS is
> > enabled. It's conflicting with that ring-based dirty page tracking always
> > requires a running VCPU context.
> >
> > Introduce a new flavor of dirty ring that requires the use of both VCPU
> > dirty rings and a dirty bitmap. The expectation is that for non-VCPU
> > sources of dirty memory (such as the VGIC/ITS on arm64), KVM writes to
> > the dirty bitmap. Userspace should scan the dirty bitmap before migrating
> > the VM to the target.
> >
> > Use an additional capability to advertise this behavior. The newly added
> > capability (KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP) can't be enabled before
> > KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL on ARM64. In this way, the newly added
> > capability is treated as an extension of KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> > Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> > Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 33 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> > include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h | 7 +++++
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> > include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
> > virt/kvm/Kconfig | 8 ++++++
> > virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c | 10 +++++++
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 7 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > index eee9f857a986..2ec32bd41792 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > @@ -8003,13 +8003,6 @@ flushing is done by the KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl). To achieve that, one
> > needs to kick the vcpu out of KVM_RUN using a signal. The resulting
> > vmexit ensures that all dirty GFNs are flushed to the dirty rings.
> > -NOTE: the capability KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING and the corresponding
> > -ioctl KVM_RESET_DIRTY_RINGS are mutual exclusive to the existing ioctls
> > -KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG and KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG. After enabling
> > -KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING with an acceptable dirty ring size, the virtual
> > -machine will switch to ring-buffer dirty page tracking and further
> > -KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG or KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG ioctls will fail.
> > -
> > NOTE: KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL is the only capability that
> > should be exposed by weakly ordered architecture, in order to indicate
> > the additional memory ordering requirements imposed on userspace when
> > @@ -8018,6 +8011,32 @@ Architecture with TSO-like ordering (such as x86) are allowed to
> > expose both KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING and KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL
> > to userspace.
> > +After using the dirty rings, the userspace needs to detect the
> > capability
> > +of KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP to see whether the ring structures
> > +need to be backed by per-slot bitmaps. With this capability advertised
> > +and supported, it means the architecture can dirty guest pages without
> > +vcpu/ring context, so that some of the dirty information will still be
> > +maintained in the bitmap structure. KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP
> > +can't be enabled until the capability of KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL
> > +has been enabled.
> > +
> > +Note that the bitmap here is only a backup of the ring structure, and
> > +normally should only contain a very small amount of dirty pages, which
> > +needs to be transferred during VM downtime. Collecting the dirty bitmap
> > +should be the very last thing that the VMM does before transmitting state
> > +to the target VM. VMM needs to ensure that the dirty state is final and
> > +avoid missing dirty pages from another ioctl ordered after the bitmap
> > +collection.
> > +
> > +To collect dirty bits in the backup bitmap, the userspace can use the
> > +same KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl. KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG shouldn't be needed
> > +and its behavior is undefined since collecting the dirty bitmap always
> > +happens in the last phase of VM's migration.
> > +
> > +NOTE: One example of using the backup bitmap is saving arm64 vgic/its
> > +tables through KVM_DEV_ARM_{VGIC_GRP_CTRL, ITS_SAVE_TABLES} command on
> > +KVM device "kvm-arm-vgic-its" during VM's migration.
> > +
>
> In order to speed up the review and reduce unnecessary respins. After
> collecting comments on PATCH[v8 3/7] from Marc and Peter, I would change
> above description as below. Could you please confirm it looks good to you?
>
> In the 4th paragraph, the words starting from "Collecting the dirty bitmap..."
> to the end, was previously suggested by Oliver, even Marc suggested to avoid
> mentioning "migration".
>
> After enabling the dirty rings, the userspace needs to detect the
> capability of KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP to see whether the ring
> structures need to be backed by per-slot bitmaps. With this capability
s/need/can/. If there was a *need*, it should happen automatically
without user intervention.
> advertised, it means the architecture can dirty guest pages without
> vcpu/ring context, so that some of the dirty information will still be
> maintained in the bitmap structure. KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP
> can't be enabled if the capability of KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL
> hasn't been enabled, or any memslot has been existing.
>
> Note that the bitmap here is only a backup of the ring structure. The
> use of the ring and bitmap combination is only beneficial if there is
> only a very small amount of memory that is dirtied out of vcpu/ring
> context. Otherwise, the stand-alone per-slot bitmap mechanism needs to
> be considered.
>
> To collect dirty bits in the backup bitmap, userspace can use the same
> KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl. KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG isn't needed as long as all
> the generation of the dirty bits is done in a single pass. Collecting
> the dirty bitmap should be the very last thing that the VMM does before
> transmitting state to the target VM. VMM needs to ensure that the dirty
> state is final and avoid missing dirty pages from another ioctl ordered
> after the bitmap collection.
I would replace "transmitting state to the target VM" with
"considering the state as complete", as I still object to casting this
API into the migration mold. People use this stuff more far more than
migration (checkpointing, for example).
>
> NOTE: One example of using the backup bitmap is saving arm64 vgic/its
> tables through KVM_DEV_ARM_{VGIC_GRP_CTRL, ITS_SAVE_TABLES} command on
> KVM device "kvm-arm-vgic-its" during VM's migration.
Same remark about migration.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 23:40 [PATCH v8 0/7] KVM: arm64: Enable ring-based dirty memory tracking Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM_REQ_DIRTY_RING_SOFT_FULL Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] KVM: Move declaration of kvm_cpu_dirty_log_size() to kvm_dirty_ring.h Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] KVM: Support dirty ring in conjunction with bitmap Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-06 15:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 15:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 16:22 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-06 16:22 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-06 20:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 20:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 21:06 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-06 21:06 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-06 21:23 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-06 21:23 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-07 9:38 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-07 9:38 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-07 14:29 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-07 14:29 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-07 9:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-07 9:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-07 14:59 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-07 14:59 ` Peter Xu
2022-11-07 15:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-07 15:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 21:40 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-06 21:40 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-07 9:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-07 9:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-07 10:45 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-07 10:45 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-07 11:33 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-11-07 11:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-07 23:53 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-07 23:53 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-07 16:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-07 16:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-08 0:44 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-08 0:44 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-08 1:13 ` Oliver Upton
2022-11-08 1:13 ` Oliver Upton
2022-11-08 3:30 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-08 3:30 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] KVM: arm64: Enable ring-based dirty memory tracking Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-06 15:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 15:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 21:46 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-06 21:46 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-07 9:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-07 9:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-07 10:47 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-07 10:47 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] KVM: selftests: Use host page size to map ring buffer in dirty_log_test Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] KVM: selftests: Clear dirty ring states between two modes " Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] KVM: selftests: Automate choosing dirty ring size " Gavin Shan
2022-11-04 23:40 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-06 16:08 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] KVM: arm64: Enable ring-based dirty memory tracking Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 16:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 21:50 ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-06 21:50 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=861qqfq9s2.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenyzha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox