Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Adjust range of accessible PMCs according to HPMN
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 13:14:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86bjzo5hdv.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007174559.1830205-13-oliver.upton@linux.dev>

On Mon, 07 Oct 2024 18:45:54 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
> The value of MDCR_EL2.HPMN controls the number of event counters made
> visible to EL0 and EL1. This means it is possible for the guest
> hypervisor to allow direct access to event counters to the L2.
> 
> Rework KVM's PMU register emulation to take the effects of HPMN into
> account when handling a trap. For bitmask-style registers, writes only
> affect accessible registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 12 ++++++------
>  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h     |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> index ca5da1da477d..746ff1ceb998 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> @@ -276,6 +276,18 @@ bool kvm_pmu_counter_is_hyp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx)
>  	return idx >= hpmn;
>  }
>  
> +u64 kvm_pmu_accessible_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	u64 mask = kvm_pmu_implemented_counter_mask(vcpu);
> +	u64 hpmn;
> +
> +	if (!vcpu_has_nv(vcpu) || vcpu_is_el2(vcpu))
> +		return mask;
> +
> +	hpmn = SYS_FIELD_GET(MDCR_EL2, HPMN, __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MDCR_EL2));
> +	return mask & GENMASK(hpmn - 1, 0);

Doesn't this break the cycle counter (bit 31)? Also, this is not going
to play very well with FEAT_ICNTR, where the instruction counter is
bit 32 in the mask.

Could we instead clear the bits from (PMCR_EL0.N - 1) down to HPMN?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-13 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-07 17:45 [PATCH v3 00/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Support for EL2 PMU controls Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] KVM: arm64: Extend masking facility to arbitrary registers Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] arm64: sysreg: Migrate MDCR_EL2 definition to table Oliver Upton
2024-10-13 11:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] arm64: sysreg: Add missing definitions for ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] KVM: arm64: Describe RES0/RES1 bits of MDCR_EL2 Oliver Upton
2024-10-13 11:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Allow coarse-grained trap combos to use complex traps Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Rename BEHAVE_FORWARD_ANY Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Reinject traps that take effect in Host EL0 Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Honor MDCR_EL2.{TPM, TPMCR} " Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Describe trap behaviour of MDCR_EL2.HPMN Oliver Upton
2024-10-13 12:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Advertise support for FEAT_HPMN0 Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] KVM: arm64: Rename kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask() Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Adjust range of accessible PMCs according to HPMN Oliver Upton
2024-10-13 12:14   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] KVM: arm64: Add helpers to determine if PMC counts at a given EL Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Honor MDCR_EL2.HPME Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Honor MDCR_EL2.HLP Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Apply EL2 event filtering when in hyp context Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Reprogram PMU events affected by nested transition Oliver Upton
2024-10-13 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] KVM: arm64: nv: Support for EL2 PMU controls Marc Zyngier
2024-10-25  5:17 ` Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86bjzo5hdv.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox