From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
andrew.jones@linux.dev, will@kernel.org, shan.gavin@gmail.com,
bgardon@google.com, dmatlack@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com,
shuah@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: selftests: dirty-log: Upgrade dirty_gfn_set_collected() to store-release
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:49:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a66qjgd8.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABgObfbtVAM3t2WC6-8-fLdQZTs6B5Xf2-CZ4oWdJMzXNFWy_g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 22:38:58 +0100,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 7:02 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> > To make sure that all the writes to the log marking the entries
> > as being in need of reset are observed in order, use a
> > smp_store_release() when updating the log entry flags.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>
> You also need a load-acquire on the load of gfn->flags in
> dirty_gfn_is_dirtied. Otherwise reading cur->slot or cur->offset might
> see a stale value.
Ah, indeed. smp_wmb() is implemented as DMB ISHST, which only orders
writes, and not loads against writes. Global barriers are just
confusing.
/me goes and repaint the stuff...
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-23 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-22 17:01 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Fix dirty-ring ordering on weakly ordered architectures Marc Zyngier
2022-09-22 17:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: Use acquire/release semantics when accessing dirty ring GFN state Marc Zyngier
2022-09-22 21:38 ` Peter Xu
2022-09-22 23:46 ` Gavin Shan
2022-09-23 14:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-23 14:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-23 14:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-22 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: Add KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ORDERED capability and config option Marc Zyngier
2022-09-22 21:48 ` Peter Xu
2022-09-23 0:04 ` Gavin Shan
2022-09-23 14:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-23 18:26 ` Peter Xu
2022-09-23 21:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-23 22:34 ` Peter Xu
2022-09-24 8:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-24 11:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-24 13:22 ` Peter Xu
2022-09-24 18:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-25 23:17 ` Gavin Shan
2022-09-22 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: Select CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_DIRTY_RING_ORDERED Marc Zyngier
2022-09-23 22:46 ` Peter Xu
2022-09-24 8:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-24 13:29 ` Peter Xu
2022-09-22 17:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: Document weakly ordered architecture requirements for dirty ring Marc Zyngier
2022-09-22 17:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: selftests: dirty-log: Upgrade dirty_gfn_set_collected() to store-release Marc Zyngier
2022-09-22 21:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-23 14:49 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-09-22 17:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: selftests: dirty-log: Use KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ORDERED of available Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a66qjgd8.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenyzha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox