Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, maz@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM: arm64: Move pkvm_vcpu_init_traps() to init_pkvm_hyp_vcpu()
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:37:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zw4byVfZngXV19ni@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014102413.4092725-2-tabba@google.com>

On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 11:24:09AM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> Move pkvm_vcpu_init_traps() to the initialization of the
> hypervisor's vcpu state in init_pkvm_hyp_vcpu(), and remove the
> associated hypercall.
> 
> In protected mode, traps need to be initialized whenever a VCPU
> is initialized anyway, and not only for protected VMs. This also
> saves an unnecessary hypercall.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h               | 1 -
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                           | 8 --------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/trap_handler.h | 2 --
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c             | 8 --------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c                 | 4 +++-
>  5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> index b36a3b6cc011..7f7866d2bfc2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> @@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ enum __kvm_host_smccc_func {
>  	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_timer_set_cntvoff,
>  	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v3_save_vmcr_aprs,
>  	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v3_restore_vmcr_aprs,
> -	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_vcpu_init_traps,
>  	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_init_vm,
>  	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_init_vcpu,
>  	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_teardown_vm,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index a0d01c46e408..ece934bb4531 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -856,14 +856,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		static_branch_inc(&userspace_irqchip_in_use);
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Initialize traps for protected VMs.
> -	 * NOTE: Move to run in EL2 directly, rather than via a hypercall, once
> -	 * the code is in place for first run initialization at EL2.
> -	 */
> -	if (kvm_vm_is_protected(kvm))
> -		kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_vcpu_init_traps, vcpu);
> -

Can we instead get rid of this hypercall by implementing the one-time
late initialization as the comment suggests?

It'd be great if the feature configuration for non-protected and
protected VMs is done in a similar way, and that is userspace changes to
the ID registers before KVM_RUN.

So we need this sort of 'late' initialization for that behavior to work.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-15  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-14 10:24 [PATCH v1 0/4] KVM: arm64: Fix initialization of trap register values in pKVM Fuad Tabba
2024-10-14 10:24 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM: arm64: Move pkvm_vcpu_init_traps() to init_pkvm_hyp_vcpu() Fuad Tabba
2024-10-15  7:37   ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-10-15  8:22     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-10-15  8:30       ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-15  9:35         ` Fuad Tabba
2024-10-14 10:24 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth() for hyp use Fuad Tabba
2024-10-14 10:24 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] KVM: arm64: Initialize the hypervisor's VM state at EL2 Fuad Tabba
2024-10-14 10:24 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] KVM: arm64: Initialize trap register values in hyp in pKVM Fuad Tabba
2024-10-15  7:57   ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-15  8:19     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-10-15  8:22       ` Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zw4byVfZngXV19ni@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox