From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
robh@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
joey.gouly@arm.com, ahmed.genidi@arm.com, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
scott@os.amperecomputing.com, mbenes@suse.cz,
james.clark@linaro.org, frederic@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
pavel@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: initialise SCTLR2_EL1 at cpu_soft_restart()
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:32:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKYGsqCTRXwnb6Gw@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aKXlnZ8HXHBZMj4T@e133380.arm.com>
Hi Dave,
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 01:01:17PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > SCTLR2_EL1 register is optional starting from ARMv8.8/ARMv9.3,
> > and becomes mandatory from ARMv8.9/ARMv9.4
> > and serveral architectural feature are controled by bits in
> > these registers.
> >
> > Before, launching new kernel via kexec, initialise SCTLR2_EL1 explicitly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpu-reset.S | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu-reset.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu-reset.S
> > index c87445dde674..123564af345b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu-reset.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu-reset.S
> > @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START(cpu_soft_restart)
> > * regime if HCR_EL2.E2H == 1
> > */
> > msr sctlr_el1, x12
> > +
> > +alternative_if ARM64_HAS_SCTLR2
> > + mov_q x12, INIT_SCTLR2_EL1
> > + msr_s SYS_SCTLR2_EL1, x12
> > +alternative_else_nop_endif
> > +
>
> It would be better to do this based on the ID regs.
>
> Although the previous kernel _shouldn't_ have used SCTLR2 if the
> capability ARM64_HAS_SCTLR2 did not get enabled, it would be better to
> enforce a clean state here for the new kernel.
>
> If so, maybe one of the macros that you already defined can be used
> here? (But it's also fine to open-code it.)
But cpu_soft_restart() can be called before capability is enabled?
I think this function is called after "capability" setup,
Was it good to use alternative than check the ID register?
>
> > isb
> >
> > cbz x0, 1f // el2_switch?
>
> [...]
>
> In the case where the el2_switch argument in non-zero, don't we also
> need to do something to reinitialise SCTLR2_EL2 after switching back
> to EL2, in the HVC_SOFT_RESTART handler?
>
> Maybe I missed something.
No. I'm missing to init in NVHE's HVC_SOFT_RESTART handler to clear SCTLR2_EL2.
Thanks!
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-20 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-13 12:01 [PATCH v3 0/5] initialize SCTRL2_ELx Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] arm64: make SCTLR2_EL1 accessible Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-20 15:10 ` Dave Martin
2025-08-20 18:51 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: initialise SCTLR2_ELx register at boot time Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-20 15:10 ` Dave Martin
2025-08-20 17:18 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: save/restore SCTLR2_EL1 when cpu_suspend()/resume() Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-20 15:11 ` Dave Martin
2025-08-20 17:22 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: initialise SCTLR2_EL1 at cpu_soft_restart() Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-20 15:11 ` Dave Martin
2025-08-20 17:32 ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-09-01 15:01 ` Dave Martin
2025-08-21 10:14 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-13 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: make the per-task SCTLR2_EL1 Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-20 15:11 ` Dave Martin
2025-08-20 17:34 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-20 15:11 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] initialize SCTRL2_ELx Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKYGsqCTRXwnb6Gw@e129823.arm.com \
--to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=ahmed.genidi@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox