Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 20/43] arm64: RME: Runtime faulting of memory
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 09:55:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c544b3fe-3cf2-4dcd-8c0f-ab9f1795e305@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1b3caaf-636f-48e6-90e6-0bb650753748@arm.com>

On 20/05/2025 15:48, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 16/05/2025 16:33, Steven Price wrote:
>> On 01/05/2025 01:16, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> On 4/16/25 11:41 PM, Steven Price wrote:
>>>> At runtime if the realm guest accesses memory which hasn't yet been
>>>> mapped then KVM needs to either populate the region or fault the guest.
>>>>
>>>> For memory in the lower (protected) region of IPA a fresh page is
>>>> provided to the RMM which will zero the contents. For memory in the
>>>> upper (shared) region of IPA, the memory from the memslot is mapped
>>>> into the realm VM non secure.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes since v7:
>>>>    * Remove redundant WARN_ONs for realm_create_rtt_levels() - it will
>>>>      internally WARN when necessary.
>>>> Changes since v6:
>>>>    * Handle PAGE_SIZE being larger than RMM granule size.
>>>>    * Some minor renaming following review comments.
>>>> Changes since v5:
>>>>    * Reduce use of struct page in preparation for supporting the RMM
>>>>      having a different page size to the host.
>>>>    * Handle a race when delegating a page where another CPU has
>>>> faulted on
>>>>      a the same page (and already delegated the physical page) but
>>>> not yet
>>>>      mapped it. In this case simply return to the guest to either
>>>> use the
>>>>      mapping from the other CPU (or refault if the race is lost).
>>>>    * The changes to populate_par_region() are moved into the previous
>>>>      patch where they belong.
>>>> Changes since v4:
>>>>    * Code cleanup following review feedback.
>>>>    * Drop the PTE_SHARED bit when creating unprotected page table
>>>> entries.
>>>>      This is now set by the RMM and the host has no control of it
>>>> and the
>>>>      spec requires the bit to be set to zero.
>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>>    * Avoid leaking memory if failing to map it in the realm.
>>>>    * Correctly mask RTT based on LPA2 flag (see rtt_get_phys()).
>>>>    * Adapt to changes in previous patches.
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  10 ++
>>>>    arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h     |  10 ++
>>>>    arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c                 | 127 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>    arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c                 | 180 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> +++++
>>>>    4 files changed, 321 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/
>>>> include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>>>> index c803c8188d9c..def439d6d732 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>>>> @@ -704,6 +704,16 @@ static inline bool kvm_realm_is_created(struct
>>>> kvm *kvm)
>>>>        return kvm_is_realm(kvm) && kvm_realm_state(kvm) !=
>>>> REALM_STATE_NONE;
>>>>    }
>>>>    +static inline gpa_t kvm_gpa_from_fault(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t
>>>> ipa)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    if (kvm_is_realm(kvm)) {
>>>> +        struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
>>>> +
>>>> +        return ipa & ~BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1);
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    return ipa;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    static inline bool vcpu_is_rec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>>    {
>>>>        if (static_branch_unlikely(&kvm_rme_is_available))
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h b/arch/arm64/include/
>>>> asm/kvm_rme.h
>>>> index d86051ef0c5c..47aa6362c6c9 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
>>>> @@ -108,6 +108,16 @@ void kvm_realm_unmap_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>>>>                   unsigned long ipa,
>>>>                   unsigned long size,
>>>>                   bool unmap_private);
>>>> +int realm_map_protected(struct realm *realm,
>>>> +            unsigned long base_ipa,
>>>> +            kvm_pfn_t pfn,
>>>> +            unsigned long size,
>>>> +            struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *memcache);
>>>> +int realm_map_non_secure(struct realm *realm,
>>>> +             unsigned long ipa,
>>>> +             kvm_pfn_t pfn,
>>>> +             unsigned long size,
>>>> +             struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *memcache);
>>>>      static inline bool kvm_realm_is_private_address(struct realm
>>>> *realm,
>>>>                            unsigned long addr)
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>>>> index 71c04259e39f..02b66ee35426 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>>>> @@ -338,8 +338,13 @@ static void __unmap_stage2_range(struct
>>>> kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t start, u64
>>>>          lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>>>        WARN_ON(size & ~PAGE_MASK);
>>>> -    WARN_ON(stage2_apply_range(mmu, start, end,
>>>> KVM_PGT_FN(kvm_pgtable_stage2_unmap),
>>>> -                   may_block));
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (kvm_is_realm(kvm))
>>>> +        kvm_realm_unmap_range(kvm, start, size, !only_shared);
>>>> +    else
>>>> +        WARN_ON(stage2_apply_range(mmu, start, end,
>>>> +                       KVM_PGT_FN(kvm_pgtable_stage2_unmap),
>>>> +                       may_block));
>>>>    }
>>>>    
>>>
>>> As spotted previsouly, the parameter @may_block isn't handled by
>>> kvm_realm_unmap_range().
>>
>> Ack.
>>
>>>>    void kvm_stage2_unmap_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t
>>>> start,
>>>> @@ -359,7 +364,10 @@ static void stage2_flush_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
>>>>        phys_addr_t addr = memslot->base_gfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>        phys_addr_t end = addr + PAGE_SIZE * memslot->npages;
>>>>    -    kvm_stage2_flush_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, addr, end);
>>>> +    if (kvm_is_realm(kvm))
>>>> +        kvm_realm_unmap_range(kvm, addr, end - addr, false);
>>>> +    else
>>>> +        kvm_stage2_flush_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, addr, end);
>>>>    }
>>>>      /**
>>>> @@ -1053,6 +1061,10 @@ void stage2_unmap_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>>        struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
>>>>        int idx, bkt;
>>>>    +    /* For realms this is handled by the RMM so nothing to do
>>>> here */
>>>> +    if (kvm_is_realm(kvm))
>>>> +        return;
>>>> +
>>>>        idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
>>>>        mmap_read_lock(current->mm);
>>>>        write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>>> @@ -1078,6 +1090,7 @@ void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>>>>        if (kvm_is_realm(kvm) &&
>>>>            (kvm_realm_state(kvm) != REALM_STATE_DEAD &&
>>>>             kvm_realm_state(kvm) != REALM_STATE_NONE)) {
>>>> +        kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, 0, (~0ULL) & PAGE_MASK, false);
>>>>            write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>>>            kvm_realm_destroy_rtts(kvm, pgt->ia_bits);
>>>
>>> (~0ULL & PAGE_MASK) wouldn't be a problem since the range will be
>>> limited to
>>> [0, BIT(realm->ia_bits) - 1] in kvm_realm_unmap_range(). I think it's
>>> reasonable
>>> to pass the maximal size here, something like:
>>>
>>>          kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, 0, BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1), false);
> 
> I think this must be, given the end is excluding:
>        kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, 0, BIT(realm->ia_bits), false);
> 
> BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1) only covers the protected half. The unprotected
> half spans  [ BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1), BIT(realm->ia_bits))

The kernel treats the two halves as aliasing. kvm_realm_unmap_range()
caps the end to min(BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1), end). So this wouldn't make
any difference.

This an unfortunate outcome of the memory slots describing both the
protected region (via guestmem_fd) and the shared region (via VMM maps).
So a single memslot describes two regions which leads to the kernel
treating those regions as aliasing for some purposes.

Thanks,
Steve


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-21  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-16 13:41 [PATCH v8 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 01/43] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 02/43] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 03/43] arm64: RME: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2025-04-25 10:30   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 04/43] arm64: RME: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2025-04-25 10:48   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-25 10:53     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 05/43] arm64: RME: Check for RME support at KVM init Steven Price
2025-04-25 11:08   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-01 13:31     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 06/43] arm64: RME: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2025-04-28  8:58   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-01 13:31     ` Steven Price
2025-05-01 13:47       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-30  4:25   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01 13:44     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 07/43] arm64: RME: ioctls to create and configure realms Steven Price
2025-04-29  9:45   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-01 15:09     ` Steven Price
2025-04-30  5:39   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01 15:11     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 08/43] kvm: arm64: Don't expose debug capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2025-04-30  5:42   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 09/43] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2025-04-30  5:47   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 10/43] arm64: RME: RTT tear down Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 11/43] arm64: RME: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2025-05-01 16:50   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 12/43] KVM: arm64: vgic: Provide helper for number of list registers Steven Price
2025-04-30  5:54   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01 16:51   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 13/43] arm64: RME: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2025-05-02 11:04   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-12 14:44     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 14/43] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2025-05-02 12:22   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 15/43] arm64: RME: Allow VMM to set RIPAS Steven Price
2025-04-30 11:38   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01 16:00     ` Steven Price
2025-05-01 23:59       ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-06 13:23   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-12 14:45     ` Steven Price
2025-05-13 10:43       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-14 10:24         ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 16/43] arm64: RME: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2025-04-30 11:55   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-12 14:45     ` Steven Price
2025-05-07 10:26   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-12 14:45     ` Steven Price
2025-05-29  4:52   ` Emi Kisanuki (Fujitsu)
2025-06-02 15:14     ` Steven Price
2025-06-02 15:16       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 17/43] arm64: RME: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2025-04-30 12:11   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-16 13:50     ` Steven Price
2025-05-07 10:42   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-16 13:50     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 18/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2025-05-19 18:11   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 19/43] arm64: RME: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 20/43] arm64: RME: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2025-05-01  0:16   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-16 15:33     ` Steven Price
2025-05-20 14:48       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-21  8:55         ` Steven Price [this message]
2025-05-19 17:35   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-20 14:58     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-21  9:10     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 21/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2025-05-19 17:48   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-21 10:21     ` Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 22/43] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2025-05-01  2:54   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-19 17:56   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 23/43] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 24/43] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 25/43] arm64: Don't expose stolen time for realm guests Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 26/43] arm64: RME: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 27/43] arm64: RME: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2025-05-01  2:57   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 28/43] arm64: RME: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 29/43] arm64: RME: Always use 4k pages for realms Steven Price
2025-05-01  2:59   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 14:59   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 30/43] arm64: RME: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2025-05-20 13:20   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 31/43] arm_pmu: Provide a mechanism for disabling the physical IRQ Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 32/43] arm64: RME: Enable PMU support with a realm guest Steven Price
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 33/43] arm64: RME: Hide KVM_CAP_READONLY_MEM for realm guests Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:01   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 12:45   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 34/43] arm64: RME: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:36   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01  3:40     ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-01  3:40   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 12:47   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 35/43] arm64: RME: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2025-05-20 12:48   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 36/43] arm64: RME: Initialize PMCR.N with number counter supported by RMM Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:42   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 12:49   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v8 37/43] arm64: RME: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:50   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 12:50   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 38/43] arm64: RME: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:50   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 12:52   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 39/43] arm64: RME: Provide register list for unfinalized RME RECs Steven Price
2025-05-01 23:30   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 40/43] arm64: RME: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2025-05-01 23:41   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 13:15   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 41/43] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:04   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 42/43] KVM: arm64: Expose KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC to user space Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:04   ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-16 13:42 ` [PATCH v8 43/43] KVM: arm64: Allow activating realms Steven Price
2025-05-01  3:06   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-20 13:12   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-05-02  0:46 ` [PATCH v8 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Gavin Shan
2025-05-16 16:00   ` Steven Price
2025-05-15  3:01 ` Emi Kisanuki (Fujitsu)
2025-05-16 15:57   ` Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c544b3fe-3cf2-4dcd-8c0f-ab9f1795e305@arm.com \
    --to=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=alpergun@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox