From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] arm64: cpufeature: Detect HCR_EL2.NV1 being RES0
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 13:48:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3cc70fb-16d9-4e4e-aa35-f0eb2baaf166@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122181344.258974-7-maz@kernel.org>
Dead All,
On 22.01.2024 19:13, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> A variant of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented exists in the form of
> HCR_EL2.E2H being RES1 *and* HCR_EL2.NV1 being RES0 (indicating that
> only VHE is supported on the host and nested guests).
>
> Add the necessary infrastructure for this new CPU capability.
>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
This patch landed recently in linux-next as commit da9af5071b25 ("arm64:
cpufeature: Detect HCR_EL2.NV1 being RES0"). I found that it causes a
following regression in the CPU hot-plug operation:
# for i in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[1-9]; do echo 1 >$i/online; done
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:1468!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: dw_hdmi_cec dw_hdmi_i2s_audio crct10dif_ce
snd_soc_simple_card rockchip_saradc industrialio_triggered_buffer
hantro_vpu kfifo_buf snd_soc_simple_card_utils rockchip_thermal
phy_rockchip_naneng_combphy display_connector gpio_ir_recv v4l2_vp9
v4l2_h264 v4l2_mem2mem dwmac_rk videobuf2_dma_contig stmmac_platform
videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 stmmac rockchipdrm videodev
snd_soc_rockchip_i2s_tdm snd_soc_rk817 pcs_xpcs panfrost rtc_rk808
rk805_pwrkey analogix_dp rk817_charger spi_rockchip_sfc dw_mipi_dsi
videobuf2_common dw_hdmi drm_shmem_helper mc gpu_sched
drm_display_helper ahci_dwc ip_tables x_tables ipv6
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1+ #14563
Hardware name: Hardkernel ODROID-M1 (DT)
pstate: 800001c9 (Nzcv dAIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : __read_sysreg_by_encoding+0x38c/0x390
lr : read_scoped_sysreg+0x4c/0x70
...
Call trace:
__read_sysreg_by_encoding+0x38c/0x390
read_scoped_sysreg+0x4c/0x70
has_nv1+0x18/0x48
verify_local_cpu_caps+0x54/0x124
check_local_cpu_capabilities+0x28/0x208
secondary_start_kernel+0xb0/0x154
__secondary_switched+0xb8/0xbc
Code: d53802f3 17ffff3b d5380253 17ffff39 (d4210000)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
Kernel Offset: disabled
CPU features: 0x1,80000000,80050295,2100721b
Memory Limit: none
---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]---
It looks that some additional checks are needed for the CPU hot-plug case.
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index ad3753fbdcb1..91249d20883b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -1794,6 +1794,11 @@ static bool unmap_kernel_at_el0(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
> return !meltdown_safe;
> }
>
> +static bool has_nv1(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, int scope)
> +{
> + return !has_cpuid_feature(entry, scope);
> +}
> +
> #if defined(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_TGRAN_LPA2) && defined(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_TGRAN_2_SUPPORTED_LPA2)
> static bool has_lpa2_at_stage1(u64 mmfr0)
> {
> @@ -2794,6 +2799,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
> .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
> .matches = has_lpa2,
> },
> + {
> + .desc = "NV1",
> + .capability = ARM64_HAS_HCR_NV1,
> + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
> + .matches = has_nv1,
> + ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS_NEG(ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, E2H0, NI_NV1)
> + },
> {},
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> index b912b1409fc0..65090dd34641 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_IMP_DEF
> HAS_GIC_CPUIF_SYSREGS
> HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING
> HAS_GIC_PRIO_RELAXED_SYNC
> +HAS_HCR_NV1
> HAS_HCX
> HAS_LDAPR
> HAS_LPA2
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 18:13 [PATCH v4 00/10] arm64: Add support for FEAT_E2H0, or lack thereof Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] arm64: Add macro to compose a sysreg field value Marc Zyngier
2024-02-08 11:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-01-22 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] arm64: cpufeatures: Correctly handle signed values Marc Zyngier
2024-02-08 12:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-01-22 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] arm64: cpufeature: Correctly display signed override values Marc Zyngier
2024-02-08 12:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-01-22 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] arm64: sysreg: Add layout for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 Marc Zyngier
2024-02-08 12:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-02-08 13:06 ` Miguel Luis
2024-02-08 13:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] arm64: cpufeature: Add ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 handling Marc Zyngier
2024-02-08 12:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-01-22 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] arm64: cpufeature: Detect HCR_EL2.NV1 being RES0 Marc Zyngier
2024-02-08 12:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-02-08 12:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-02-12 12:48 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2024-02-12 14:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-12 14:21 ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-01-22 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative Marc Zyngier
2024-02-08 12:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-01-22 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] KVM: arm64: Expose ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 to guests Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] KVM: arm64: Force guest's HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 when NV1 is not implemented Marc Zyngier
2024-01-22 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] KVM: arm64: Handle Apple M2 as not having HCR_EL2.NV1 implemented Marc Zyngier
2024-02-08 12:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-02-02 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] arm64: Add support for FEAT_E2H0, or lack thereof Oliver Upton
2024-02-08 12:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-02-08 15:24 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3cc70fb-16d9-4e4e-aa35-f0eb2baaf166@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox