Re: [LARTC] htb

["James Lista" <lista@umeda.com.br>]

andreas,

having one class per user seems cool... please buddy, have a sample script
of that ?
so, if i have 600kbit / 7 = 86kbit for each, is it that ???  if so, is it
too few for a single user ?
about something that i read that say "borrowing",  when a user borrow his
spare band to a "vampire", when will he gets it back when he needs it...?

thanks again

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Klauer" <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb


> Am Sunday 17 October 2004 15:02 schrieb James Lista:
> > and about that you say take a look at ipp2p or l7-filter:  errr,  can
> > they identify when a user changed edonkey or any other p2p default port
> > and limit such packet even so ????
>
> They try to. I'm using IPP2P and it works okay for me.
>
> Although my shaping setup is a little different from what you want to do.
> I've got one class per user, so everyone gets the same share of bandwidth.
> This way it doesn't matter what kind of traffic a user generates, as it
> doesn't influence the others.
>
> Prioritization is then done within the user classes, the only effect of
> that is that a user can still have a lag free SSH connection while he's
> downloading stuff at the same time.
>
> So in my setup, if the user finds a way to trick the prioritization
> settings, he's only tricking himself, because he can't escape his user
> class :)
>
> Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/