* [LARTC] HTB prio: global or per class ?
@ 2006-11-16 17:26 doudouyam
2006-11-17 11:19 ` Ales Klok
2006-11-17 13:53 ` Viktar Sakovich
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: doudouyam @ 2006-11-16 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 325 bytes --]
Hi all,
Is the prio specification in the htb class global or is it on a per
class basis ?
A simple example:
class 1:10 parent 1:
class 1:100 parent 1:10 prio 3
class 1:200 parent 1:10 prio 7
class 1:201 parent 1:200 prio 1
class 1:202 parent 1:200 prio 2
Which class will get excessive bandwidth first? 100 or 201/202 ?
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 437 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] HTB prio: global or per class ?
2006-11-16 17:26 [LARTC] HTB prio: global or per class ? doudouyam
@ 2006-11-17 11:19 ` Ales Klok
2006-11-17 13:53 ` Viktar Sakovich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ales Klok @ 2006-11-17 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
201 will get excessive bandwidth first.
/ak
doudouyam wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is the prio specification in the htb class global or is it on a per class basis ?
>
> A simple example:
>
> class 1:10 parent 1:
> class 1:100 parent 1:10 prio 3
>
>
> class 1:200 parent 1:10 prio 7
> class 1:201 parent 1:200 prio 1
> class 1:202 parent 1:200 prio 2
>
> Which class will get excessive bandwidth first? 100 or 201/202 ?
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] HTB prio: global or per class ?
2006-11-16 17:26 [LARTC] HTB prio: global or per class ? doudouyam
2006-11-17 11:19 ` Ales Klok
@ 2006-11-17 13:53 ` Viktar Sakovich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Viktar Sakovich @ 2006-11-17 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Friday 17 November 2006 09:57, you wrote:
> Okay
>
> Which among you rightly? Who tests that ?
Me for example.
> If the the prio is global, it's strange and not very usefull and limit a
> lot the HTB scheduler.
I agree. But it's the way it works.
> Normaly if HTB respecte the diffserv, the prio are per class basis.
> Why is it global a
>
> 2006/11/16, Viktar Sakovich <atlantos@gmail.com>:
> > On Thursday 16 November 2006 19:26, you wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Is the prio specification in the htb class global or is it on a per
> > > class basis ?
> > >
> > > A simple example:
> > >
> > > class 1:10 parent 1:
> > > class 1:100 parent 1:10 prio 3
> > >
> > > class 1:200 parent 1:10 prio 7
> > > class 1:201 parent 1:200 prio 1
> > > class 1:202 parent 1:200 prio 2
> > >
> > > Which class will get excessive bandwidth first? 100 or 201/202 ?
> >
> > Prio specification in the htb class is global. In this example 201/202
> > will
> > get all bandwidth.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-17 13:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-16 17:26 [LARTC] HTB prio: global or per class ? doudouyam
2006-11-17 11:19 ` Ales Klok
2006-11-17 13:53 ` Viktar Sakovich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox