* [LARTC] load balance switching latency
@ 2007-10-12 2:49 Alec Joseph Rivera
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Alec Joseph Rivera @ 2007-10-12 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 722 bytes --]
Hello there.
I am setting up a router using openwrt. Part of the project is load
balancing among 2 broadband lines. I made use of the line:
ip route add default scope global \
nexthop {GW1} dev {IF1} weight 1 \
nexthop {GW2} dev {IF2} weight 1
somewhere on the configs.
On the test phase, automatically switching (routing) to line GW2 when
line GW1 is suddenly disconnected takes a long time. I'm thinking that
the routing still tries to send to GW1 even though it's dead.
a. Is there a way around this?
b. Does routing react differently to carrier loss (unplugging the cable)
to a fully loaded line?
Any thoughts? Thanks...
--
Alec Joseph Rivera
F S 3 Consulting Inc.
http://www.fs3.ph
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-10-12 2:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-12 2:49 [LARTC] load balance switching latency Alec Joseph Rivera
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox