From: Patrick Petersen <lartc@schmakk.dk>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] imq or ingress+htb?
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 17:33:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040302183118.6B8B.LARTC@schmakk.dk> (raw)
Todays quick question:
Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im
thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to
put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with ingress,
and the shape traffic on the inner interface with htb. Would that be
better than using imq?
--
Patrick Petersen <lartc@schmakk.dk>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2004-03-02 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-02 17:33 Patrick Petersen [this message]
2004-03-02 19:53 ` [LARTC] imq or ingress+htb? Stef Coene
2004-03-02 20:48 ` Roy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040302183118.6B8B.LARTC@schmakk.dk \
--to=lartc@schmakk.dk \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox