From: "Roy" <roy@xxx.lt>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] imq or ingress+htb?
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 20:48:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001f01c40097$abf5a240$030aa8c0@t> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040302183118.6B8B.LARTC@schmakk.dk>
If you only need independent trafic classes then ingress is good option, but
there is no way to prioritize trafic.
Imq is quite stable now, if your kernel is 2.4.22 and later you can easily
try compile this imq version as module.
http://pupa.da.ru/imq
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Petersen" <lartc@schmakk.dk>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: [LARTC] imq or ingress+htb?
> Todays quick question:
>
> Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im
> thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to
> put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with ingress,
> and the shape traffic on the inner interface with htb. Would that be
> better than using imq?
> --
> Patrick Petersen <lartc@schmakk.dk>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-02 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-02 17:33 [LARTC] imq or ingress+htb? Patrick Petersen
2004-03-02 19:53 ` Stef Coene
2004-03-02 20:48 ` Roy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001f01c40097$abf5a240$030aa8c0@t' \
--to=roy@xxx.lt \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox