[LARTC] imq or ingress+htb?

[LARTC] imq or ingress+htb?

[Patrick Petersen]

Todays quick question:

Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im
thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to
put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with ingress,
and the shape traffic on the inner interface with htb. Would that be
better than using imq?
-- 
Patrick Petersen <lartc@schmakk.dk>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] imq or ingress+htb?

[Stef Coene]

On Tuesday 02 March 2004 18:33, Patrick Petersen wrote:
> Todays quick question:
>
> Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im
> thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to
> put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with ingress,
> and the shape traffic on the inner interface with htb. Would that be
> better than using imq?
Yes.

Stef

-- 
stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] imq or ingress+htb?

[Roy]

If you only need independent trafic classes then ingress is good option, but
there is no way to prioritize trafic.

Imq is quite stable now, if your kernel is 2.4.22 and later you can easily
try compile this imq version as module.
http://pupa.da.ru/imq


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Patrick Petersen" <lartc@schmakk.dk>
To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: [LARTC] imq or ingress+htb?


> Todays quick question:
>
> Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im
> thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to
> put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with ingress,
> and the shape traffic on the inner interface with htb. Would that be
> better than using imq?
> -- 
> Patrick Petersen <lartc@schmakk.dk>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/