From: Marek Kierdelewicz <marek@piasta.pl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Which CPU for heavy traffic with much filtering/shaping?
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:40:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071119174034.1b7e9bb7@catlap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47415A73.9020107@interdart.co.uk>
>Hi
Hi
>I have a router with a large number of iptables rules and some
>extensive traffic shaping (HTB + RED + ... ) + conntrack.
Performance boost tips:
- Use "set" module instead of sequential iptables rules. It can lower
cpu usage.
- Use hashing filters for shaping if you're using many u32 filters.
- configure conntrack to use bigger hashsize for better performance;
i'm passing following parameter to kernel in grub to achieve this:
ip_conntrack.hashsize\x1048575
- configure routecache to use bigger to use more memory for better
performance; i'm passing following parameter to kernel in grub to
achieve this: rhash_entries$00000
>1. What processors should I be looking for in order to achieve the
>best routing throughput on a linux router?
I've had good experiences with P4 (with and without HT), Athlon64, Xeon
[dempsey], Xeon [woodcrest]. The last one is the best choice because of
the large cache and architecture. I think you can use Core 2 Duo too
if you want to save some money.
>2. Is it true that multicore processors will not help much in this
>situation?
Not true. In your setup with two nics with same load you can easily use
two cores. You can assign each nic to different core by the means of
smp_affinity setting in /proc/irq/... or by using irqbalance daemon.
>Best regards,
>Derek
pozdrawiam
Marek Kierdelewicz
KoBa ISP
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-19 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-19 9:42 [LARTC] Which CPU for heavy traffic with much filtering/shaping? Derek Sims
2007-11-19 16:40 ` Marek Kierdelewicz [this message]
2007-11-19 17:55 ` Derek Sims
2007-11-19 23:08 ` sawar
2007-11-20 1:03 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2007-11-20 3:15 ` Mohan Sundaram
2007-11-20 3:30 ` Mohan Sundaram
2007-11-20 16:03 ` Marco C. Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071119174034.1b7e9bb7@catlap \
--to=marek@piasta.pl \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox