Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Derek Sims <derek@interdart.co.uk>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Which CPU for heavy traffic with much filtering/shaping?
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:55:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4741CE08.8020506@interdart.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47415A73.9020107@interdart.co.uk>

Marek Kierdelewicz wrote:
>> Hi
>>     
>
> Hi
>
>   
>> I have a router with a large number of iptables rules and some
>> extensive traffic shaping (HTB + RED + ... ) + conntrack.
>>     
>
> Performance boost tips:
>
> - Use "set" module instead of sequential iptables rules. It can lower
> cpu usage.
>   

Hmm - I don't know what the "set" module is - can you point me to some 
documentation please?
> - Use hashing filters for shaping if you're using many u32 filters.
>   
Only 3
> - configure conntrack to use bigger hashsize for better performance;
> i'm passing following parameter to kernel in grub to achieve this:
> ip_conntrack.hashsize\x1048575 
>
>   
I have 64k in conntrack_max and hashsize of 16000
Currently running with about 20000 conntrack connections

I will try increasing this
> - configure routecache to use bigger to use more memory for better
> performance; i'm passing following parameter to kernel in grub to
> achieve this: rhash_entries$00000
>
>   
>> 1. What processors should I be looking for in order to achieve the
>> best routing throughput on a linux router?
>>     
>
> I've had good experiences with P4 (with and without HT), Athlon64, Xeon
> [dempsey], Xeon [woodcrest]. The last one is the best choice because of
> the large cache and architecture. I think you can use Core 2 Duo too
> if you want to save some money.
>
>   
Thanks - I will see what I can get
>> 2. Is it true that multicore processors will not help much in this 
>> situation?
>>     
>
> Not true. In your setup with two nics with same load you can easily use
> two cores. You can assign each nic to different core by the means of
> smp_affinity setting in /proc/irq/... or by using irqbalance daemon.
>
>   
That is good news :) - however I guess 4 core with dual ethernet would 
not help very much!
>> Best regards,
>> Derek
>>     
>
> pozdrawiam
> Marek Kierdelewicz
> KoBa ISP
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list
> LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
>   
Best regards,
Derek
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-19 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-19  9:42 [LARTC] Which CPU for heavy traffic with much filtering/shaping? Derek Sims
2007-11-19 16:40 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2007-11-19 17:55 ` Derek Sims [this message]
2007-11-19 23:08 ` sawar
2007-11-20  1:03 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2007-11-20  3:15 ` Mohan Sundaram
2007-11-20  3:30 ` Mohan Sundaram
2007-11-20 16:03 ` Marco C. Coelho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4741CE08.8020506@interdart.co.uk \
    --to=derek@interdart.co.uk \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox