* [LARTC] Port forwarding/translation control
@ 2004-05-03 21:19 Patrick Turley
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Patrick Turley @ 2004-05-03 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
My Linux system is acting as a NAT'ing firewall, and I have some rules
for doing port forwarding/translation.
I was thinking about this the other day and I realized that there are
other parts of the system that consume ports. Specifically, NAT and
ephemeral port allocation.
It occurs to me that I could potentially have a conflict. If I set up a
rule to forward/translate a port, and the NAT'ing code picks the same
port for what it's doing, then there would be a big problem.
Eventually, I'll need to dynamically allocate ports of my own for
transitory port forwarding/translation. I need a way to set aside some
ports that I can use sure the NAT'ing code and the ephemeral port
allocation code won't try to use.
If anyone has anything illuminating to say on this point, I'd be very
grateful.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-05-03 21:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-03 21:19 [LARTC] Port forwarding/translation control Patrick Turley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox