From: pljosh <witek876@interia.pl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* in HTB or some
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 11:56:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D57B6A.7040309@interia.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40D21439.7000702@interia.pl>
U¿ytkownik Andy Furniss napisa³:
> I tried with your rc.shape script on my LAN using scp. I couldn't get
> the bash to work - it looks to me like it will only set one user. But I
Did you launch it passing argument in "" or ''?
./rc.shape "4 5 6"
is quite far different than
./rc.shape 4 5 6
> hardcoded my settings in it and checked with tc -s class ls dev eth0
> that my 2 classes existed.
I dont get it: you prepared two classes for two PCs which is equivalent
to "t5" on my graph which shows that HTB acts PERFECT in such conditions.
> I SCPd a file from gateway to 2 PCs and thay were shaped OK and came in
> second perfect. It was the same for 500,1000 and 5000 ceils. The 500
> test took 15 mins.
> So I don't really know whats going on for you.
> Andy.
Try the same using 3 classes and stress it with 2 PCs only (each class
has rate=1/3 of max bw and ceil=max bw. You will se that first class
will get from HTB almost TWICE as much as secound one one!
-josh
p.s.
I made same test on other network with other PCs and different kernel
version and it was the same...
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-20 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-17 21:59 [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? Can someone correct me or maybe pljosh
2004-06-18 8:05 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? Can someone correct Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 11:05 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* in HTB or some pljosh
2004-06-18 11:28 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 12:50 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 13:30 ` pljosh
2004-06-18 18:10 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-18 18:45 ` pljosh
2004-06-18 21:11 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-18 21:57 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-19 4:05 ` pljosh
2004-06-19 4:14 ` pljosh
2004-06-20 11:10 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 11:56 ` pljosh [this message]
2004-06-20 13:12 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 13:18 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-20 15:06 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 16:02 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* confirmed? pljosh
2004-06-24 9:38 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-25 3:58 ` pljosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D57B6A.7040309@interia.pl \
--to=witek876@interia.pl \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox