From: pljosh <witek876@interia.pl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* confirmed?
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:02:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D5B51B.2030704@interia.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40D21439.7000702@interia.pl>
U¿ytkownik Andy Furniss napisa³:
>
> I just tried with 2 d/l and 3 classes - I see the same as you now.
>
> Andy.
I am happy that there is finally confirmation of what I've seen :)
But what now? I am just starting with traffic shaping and my question
is: how is that - that so many people are using HTB for so long time and
nobody noticed it is not fair?
I suppose with more complex configurtions which are propably more common
the fact that some part of HTB is not fair (borrowing I suppose) is
blured and hard to notice some incorrect behavior.
Does Devik work on HTB yet. Maybe he could look at this problem closer?
Should I notice him about that? What do you think?
-josh
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-20 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-17 21:59 [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? Can someone correct me or maybe pljosh
2004-06-18 8:05 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? Can someone correct Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 11:05 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* in HTB or some pljosh
2004-06-18 11:28 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 12:50 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-18 13:30 ` pljosh
2004-06-18 18:10 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-18 18:45 ` pljosh
2004-06-18 21:11 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-18 21:57 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-19 4:05 ` pljosh
2004-06-19 4:14 ` pljosh
2004-06-20 11:10 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 11:56 ` pljosh
2004-06-20 13:12 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 13:18 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-06-20 15:06 ` Andy Furniss
2004-06-20 16:02 ` pljosh [this message]
2004-06-24 9:38 ` [LARTC] HTB is nor fair when 'borrowing? *bug* confirmed? Andy Furniss
2004-06-25 3:58 ` pljosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D5B51B.2030704@interia.pl \
--to=witek876@interia.pl \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox