* [LARTC] Marking ftp inbound traffic is impossible ?
@ 2005-01-08 7:55 ngo giang
2005-01-08 9:48 ` Dimitris Kotsonis
2005-01-08 11:57 ` Andy Furniss
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ngo giang @ 2005-01-08 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 567 bytes --]
Hello,
I searched the archives mailing list of LARTC. Everyone discussed about marking outbound ftp
traffic . I could not find any thread discussed about marking inbound ftp traffic.
With inbound ftp traffic , we don't know the random ports specified by ftp servers in passive mode ?
So marking inbound ftp traffic is impossible ?
If it is possible, can you tell me,
Thanks in advance,
nhgiang
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 823 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Marking ftp inbound traffic is impossible ?
2005-01-08 7:55 [LARTC] Marking ftp inbound traffic is impossible ? ngo giang
@ 2005-01-08 9:48 ` Dimitris Kotsonis
2005-01-08 11:57 ` Andy Furniss
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dimitris Kotsonis @ 2005-01-08 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
ngo giang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I searched the archives mailing list of LARTC. Everyone discussed about
> marking outbound ftp
>
> traffic . I could not find any thread discussed about marking inbound
> ftp traffic.
>
> With inbound ftp traffic , we don't know the random ports specified by
> ftp servers in passive mode ?
>
> So marking inbound ftp traffic is impossible ?
>
> If it is possible, can you tell me,
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> nhgiang
Use CONNMARK and owner match. For example, to mark incoming and ougoing
packets of vsftpd with fwmark 12 use the following ...
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -j CONNMARK --restore-mark
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -m owner --cmd-owner vsftpd -j MARK-set-mark 12
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -j CONNMARK --save-mark
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Marking ftp inbound traffic is impossible ?
2005-01-08 7:55 [LARTC] Marking ftp inbound traffic is impossible ? ngo giang
2005-01-08 9:48 ` Dimitris Kotsonis
@ 2005-01-08 11:57 ` Andy Furniss
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Furniss @ 2005-01-08 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
ngo giang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I searched the archives mailing list of LARTC. Everyone discussed about marking outbound ftp
>
> traffic . I could not find any thread discussed about marking inbound ftp traffic.
>
> With inbound ftp traffic , we don't know the random ports specified by ftp servers in passive mode ?
>
> So marking inbound ftp traffic is impossible ?
>
> If it is possible, can you tell me,
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> nhgiang
There's an ftp protocol netfilter match - if you are conntracking maybe
that will do it - never tested it myself.
Andy.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-08 11:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-08 7:55 [LARTC] Marking ftp inbound traffic is impossible ? ngo giang
2005-01-08 9:48 ` Dimitris Kotsonis
2005-01-08 11:57 ` Andy Furniss
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox