From: Leonardo Borda <borda@netwall.com.br>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Advanced Routing and Secondary ip address in eth0
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:53:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43A95E40.8020909@netwall.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A85B7A.90808@netwall.com.br>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2053 bytes --]
Hi gypsy,
Thank you for your help, but I have configured with succes Routing
for multiple uplinks/providers and it is working just fine.
My problem is when I have a secondary address range in one of these
cards (NICs), in my case eth0 (two ranges from the same internet provider ).
Anybody has a configuration like this?
- Eth0 ( two internet ranges address from the same router/provider )
- eth1 ( another ISP )
- eth2 LAN
??
Thanks in advanced.
gypsy escreveu:
>Leonardo Borda wrote:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>> I have configured advanced routing with success using three (03)
>>network adapters ( ETH0, ETH1 and ETH2).
>> Now I have to configure an addittion range in the same Interface
>>ETH0 ( another internet ip range address ), so I would like to have TWO
>>different ranges at the same ETHERNET CARD ( in this case ETH0 ) AND
>>having advanced routing running it.
>> I Did the same configurations as I already done it before and it is
>>not working. When testing through the secondary ip address the packets
>>get out from the wrong default gateway, however testing from primary
>>range I am able to route.
>>
>> Is it possible to do advanced routing having in the same Interface
>>TWO different ip range address?
>>
>> Somebody had done this somewhere?
>>
>>Thanks in advanced
>>
>>--
>>Atenciosamente,
>>
>>Leonardo Borda
>>
>>
>
>Leonardo,
>
>Have you Yahooed/googled this? IIRC, I came across several pages
>describing your desired setup while trying to decide how to deal with 3
>NICs and two different IPS (therefore separate nets on each NIC). Again
>IIRC, I rejected these because they were not the correct solution for
>me.
>
>Sorry I can't be more help, but I do think your solution is "out there".
>--
>gypsy
>
>
>
>
--
Atenciosamente,
Leonardo Borda - Diretor de Negócios
Netwall Tecnologia
Fone/Fax: +55 51 3388.3201
Celular: +55 51 8131.9740
mailto:borda@netwall.com.br - http://www.netwall.com.br
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2673 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-21 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-20 19:28 [LARTC] Advanced Routing and Secondary ip address in eth0 Leonardo Borda
2005-12-21 4:50 ` gypsy
2005-12-21 7:29 ` Denis Ovsienko
2005-12-21 13:53 ` Leonardo Borda [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43A95E40.8020909@netwall.com.br \
--to=borda@netwall.com.br \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox