Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonardo Borda <borda@netwall.com.br>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Advanced Routing and Secondary ip address in eth0
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:53:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43A95E40.8020909@netwall.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A85B7A.90808@netwall.com.br>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2053 bytes --]

Hi gypsy,

    Thank you for your help, but I have configured with succes Routing 
for multiple uplinks/providers and it is working just fine.
    My problem is when I have a secondary address range in one of these 
cards (NICs), in my case eth0 (two ranges from the same internet provider ).
   
    Anybody has a configuration like this?
    - Eth0 ( two internet ranges address from the same router/provider )
    - eth1 ( another ISP )
    - eth2 LAN

??

Thanks in advanced.


gypsy escreveu:

>Leonardo Borda wrote:
>  
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>    I have configured advanced routing with success using three (03)
>>network adapters ( ETH0,  ETH1 and ETH2).
>>    Now I have to configure an addittion range in the same Interface
>>ETH0 ( another internet ip range address ), so I would like to have TWO
>>different ranges at the same ETHERNET CARD ( in this case ETH0 ) AND
>>having advanced routing running it.
>>    I Did the same configurations as I already done it before and it is
>>not working. When testing through the secondary ip address the packets
>>get out from the wrong default gateway, however testing from primary
>>range I am able to route.
>>
>>    Is it possible to do advanced routing having in the same Interface
>>TWO different ip range address?
>>
>>    Somebody had done this somewhere?
>>
>>Thanks in advanced
>>
>>--
>>Atenciosamente,
>>
>>Leonardo Borda
>>    
>>
>
>Leonardo,
>
>Have you Yahooed/googled this?  IIRC, I came across several pages
>describing your desired setup while trying to decide how to deal with 3
>NICs and two different IPS (therefore separate nets on each NIC).  Again
>IIRC, I rejected these because they were not the correct solution for
>me.
>
>Sorry I can't be more help, but I do think your solution is "out there".
>--
>gypsy
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Atenciosamente,

Leonardo Borda - Diretor de Negócios
Netwall Tecnologia
Fone/Fax: +55 51 3388.3201
Celular:  +55 51 8131.9740
mailto:borda@netwall.com.br - http://www.netwall.com.br


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2673 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-21 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-20 19:28 [LARTC] Advanced Routing and Secondary ip address in eth0 Leonardo Borda
2005-12-21  4:50 ` gypsy
2005-12-21  7:29 ` Denis Ovsienko
2005-12-21 13:53 ` Leonardo Borda [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43A95E40.8020909@netwall.com.br \
    --to=borda@netwall.com.br \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox