Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LARTC] Static routing with multiple interfaces
@ 2006-06-05  8:57 Vinod Chandran
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Vinod Chandran @ 2006-06-05  8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc

Hi,

I am facing some strange problem with multipath routing.

I have set up a rule stating that any packets coming from a certain ip 
address <192.168.52.66> should use an interface < eth1>

For this, I used the following commands

/ip rule add from 192.168.52.66 table 200
ip route add default table 200 via 192.168.19.76 dev eth1/

Here 192.168.19.76 is eth1's gateway.

This is how my rule structure looks

/0:      from all lookup local
49:     from 192.168.52.66 lookup 200
50:     from all lookup main
222:    from all lookup 222
32766:  from all lookup main
32767:  from all lookup 253/

However this is not working, I have packets still going out through the 
other interface when sent from 192.168.51.66.
This is how my default table (222) looks
/default  proto static
        nexthop via 192.168.19.76  dev eth1 weight 1
        nexthop via 192.168.20.25  dev eth2 weight 1
/
I dont have a default route in the main or local table.

Is there something that I am missing to get the static rule working?

Thanks and Regards,
Vinod  C



_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-06-05  8:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-05  8:57 [LARTC] Static routing with multiple interfaces Vinod Chandran

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox