* [LARTC] Service Loading
@ 2001-10-07 10:10 Steve
2001-10-12 6:48 ` Stef Coene
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steve @ 2001-10-07 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hi,
My apologies if I've just missed the point here (I have scanned the
archives).
I have a server with an FTP service on one IP, a HTTP service on the
other. I wish to make all the upstream bandwidth available for FTP
unless an HTTP request arrives - at which point I want to throttle FTP
back and give the majority of the bandwidth to the HTTP session.
In order to test this I have the following script (I'm sure I've just
missed the point somewhere along the line):-
tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 10: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt 1000
tc class add dev ppp0 parent 10:0 classid 10:1 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate
\
128kbit allot 1514 prio 1 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000
tc class add dev ppp0 parent 10:1 classid 10:2 cbq bandwidth 10Mbit rate
\
10kbit allot 1514 prio 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000
tc filter add dev ppp0 parent 10:0 protocol ip pref 60 u32 \
match ip dst 0.0.0.0/0 flowid 10:1
tc filter add dev ppp0 parent 10:0 protocol ip pref 50 u32 \
match ip src my.ftp.server flowid 10:2
As I understand it 10:2 is a child of 10:1. As I have set the priority
of 10:2 to 8 and the priority of 10:1 to 1 then a request meeting 10:1
will have a much higher priority and the bandwidth will all be assigned
to the 10:1 session and not loan any bandwidth to 10:1.
In reality this doesnt work! If I make 10:2 bounded then it throttles
back to 10kbs. If I remove bounded it borrows bandwidth from its parent
- even at the cost of a 10:1 session.
Comments as to :-
a) why this doesn't work
b) whether this is the best way of handling this problem
....will be greatly appreciated!
With thanks,
Steve.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Service Loading
2001-10-07 10:10 [LARTC] Service Loading Steve
@ 2001-10-12 6:48 ` Stef Coene
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2001-10-12 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Sunday 07 October 2001 12:10, Steve wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My apologies if I've just missed the point here (I have scanned the
> archives).
I missed a small point. I will try to explain. When you provide no weight
parameter and you use no extraq qdiscs and you put on each class a filter,
class 10:1 and 10:2 will get each 50% of the bandwidth. Don't ask me why.
Give each class a weight parameter, create an extra class attached to the
root qdisc, attach the 2 other class to this class and point the filters
direcly to each class. You find a lot of examples and more explanation on
docum.org.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org stef.coene@belgacom.net
More QOS info : http://docum.org/
Title : "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-12 6:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-07 10:10 [LARTC] Service Loading Steve
2001-10-12 6:48 ` Stef Coene
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox