Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LARTC] RE: multiple gateways
@ 2001-10-24  5:26 Largo Hellenz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Largo Hellenz @ 2001-10-24  5:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lartc


hello,

  i noticed that the issue of multiple gateways has been a hot topic for the
last few months.  i have some questions that hopefully someone can shed some
light on.  i currently have two cable modems and they do not load balence.
a simple cron job checks for ISP gateway availability and issues route
replace commands accordingly (eg. "ip route replace default via 10.1.1.1 dev
eth1")

here is a picture:

  -------                          -------
  |cable|                          |cable|
  |modem|                          |modem|
  |ISP#1|                          |ISP#2|
  -------                          -------
     |                                |
     |eth0                            |eth0
  ----------                      ----------
  | linux  |                      | linux  |
  |FIREWALL|                      |FIREWALL|
  ----------                      ----------
     |eth1                           |eth1
     |10.1.1.1                       |10.2.2.1
     \                              /
      \                            /
       \                          /
        \ eth1                   / eth2
         \10.1.1.2              /10.2.2.2
          ----------------------
          |     linux          |
          |     ROUTER         |
          ----------------------
           /          |         \
10.0.0.0/24     10.3.3.0/24     10.4.4.0/24
eth0               eth3             eth4

my questions are:
  1) i use the SMTP of ISP#1.  when ISP#1 link goes down, ISP#2 becomes def
gateway until it goes down.  how can i mangle packets destined for
smtp.isp.com:25 at router to always use interface #1, or drop.  (unless
anyone knows of a free, relaying smtp out there...)

  2) since load balencing seems to be really difficult, what about mangling
so all outbound goes out ISP#2 and all inbound comes in ISP#1.... is this
feasable?

   3) i know a lot of people are working on this.... any leads as to where
the latest developments are?  or is this the best place to listen in?

   4) if anyone wants to comment on the functionality of my tables, id be
happy to hear it (especially any security holes!).

here are my configs:
ROUTER:
/sbin/iptables -F
/sbin/iptables -F -t nat
/sbin/iptables -P INPUT DROP
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -i eth+ -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 53 -i eth3 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 53 -i eth4 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i eth+ -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j
ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i eth+ -p icmp -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i eth+ -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix
"FIREWALL: Input: "
/sbin/iptables -P FORWARD DROP
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -o eth0 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -o eth1 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -o eth2 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth3 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth4 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -o eth+ -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j
ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth+ -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j
ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -o eth+ -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix
"FIREWALL: Forward-Out: "
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth+ -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix
"FIREWALL: Forward-In: "
/sbin/iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -j MASQUERADE

FIREWALLS:
/sbin/iptables -F
/sbin/iptables -P INPUT DROP
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -i eth+ -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i eth+ -p tcp -m state --state
ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i eth+ -p udp -m state --state
ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -p icmp -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix
"FIREWALL: Input: "
/sbin/iptables -P FORWARD DROP
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -o eth0 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j
ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -o eth1 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j
ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth+ -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix
"FIREWALL: For-In: Spoof: "
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -o eth+ -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix
"FIREWALL: For-Out: Spoof: "
/sbin/iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE


thanks in advance,
fernando pando
unix administrator


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-10-24  5:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-24  5:26 [LARTC] RE: multiple gateways Largo Hellenz

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox