* [LARTC] IMQ test
@ 2002-06-14 19:54 Tomasz Wrona
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Tomasz Wrona @ 2002-06-14 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hi,
I am testing IMQ from few days. I have quite complex setup managing two
external interfaces with many classes and over 350 users. IMQ works
reliable and stable :)
I tried to experiment and to direct flow to IMQ I used rule in mangle
table but in FORWARD chain like following:
$IPTABLES -t mangle -I FORWARD 1 -i $ext_if1 -o $internal_iface -j IMQ
--todev 0
It works fine.
I also tried to direct local destined traffic via following rule to have
opportunity to run some local services and not disturb shaping policy..
$IPTABLES -t mangle -A INPUT -i $external_iface -j IMQ --todev 0
I couldnt use PREROUTING to achieve this result due to my box is doing
NAT and I have some classes/filters related to local destination
IPs.
It looks that second [INPUT] chain have some impact on traffic shaping but
it was very strange. Then I put that rule my interactive traffic becomes
very poor [NAT box didnt generate any traffic itself]. Normal situation
RTT was about 60ms but when launched rule in "-t mangle INPUT" average RTT
jumped to 500 or even 1000 !
OK, thats all my report today :)
Going to play more with QL IMQ driver.
Regards
tw
--
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-06-14 19:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-14 19:54 [LARTC] IMQ test Tomasz Wrona
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox