* Re: [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat
2002-10-20 22:52 [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat Ciprian Niculescu
@ 2002-10-21 13:16 ` Stef Coene
2002-10-21 20:59 ` Ciprian Niculescu
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2002-10-21 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Monday 21 October 2002 00:52, Ciprian Niculescu wrote:
> i compile the $subj, and found the htb qdisc in it, what version is it??
I don't use redhat, but I'm sure there is a sch_sfq.s file in the kernel tree
where you can find the version information (HTB_VER). If you load the module
or compile htb in the kernel and use it, there is also a report in dmesg
about the htb version.
> the tc from redhat knows about htb???
Don't know, but if they have support in the kernel for htb, tc will have it
too.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat
2002-10-20 22:52 [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat Ciprian Niculescu
2002-10-21 13:16 ` Stef Coene
@ 2002-10-21 20:59 ` Ciprian Niculescu
2002-10-22 5:59 ` Stef Coene
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ciprian Niculescu @ 2002-10-21 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Stef Coene wrote:
> On Monday 21 October 2002 00:52, Ciprian Niculescu wrote:
>
>>i compile the $subj, and found the htb qdisc in it, what version is it??
>
> I don't use redhat, but I'm sure there is a sch_sfq.s file in the kernel tree
> where you can find the version information (HTB_VER). If you load the module
> or compile htb in the kernel and use it, there is also a report in dmesg
> about the htb version.
* $Id: sch_htb.c,v 1.13 2002/05/25 09:04:50 devik Exp $
#define HTB_VER 0x30006 /* major must be matched with number suplied by
TC as version */
no mesage in dmesg
>
>
>>the tc from redhat knows about htb???
>
> Don't know, but if they have support in the kernel for htb, tc will have it
> too.
tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root htb default 6
Unknown qdisc "htb", hence option "default" is unparsable
and it's compiled in kernel, not module
C
-------------------------------------------------------
Xnet scaneaza automat toate mesajele impotriva virusilor folosind RAV AntiVirus.
Xnet automatically scans all messages for viruses using RAV AntiVirus.
Nota: RAV AntiVirus poate sa nu detecteze toti virusii noi sau toate variantele lor. Va rugam sa luati in considerare ca exista un risc de fiecare data cand deschideti fisiere atasate si ca MobiFon nu este responsabila pentru nici un prejudiciu cauzat de virusi.
Disclaimer: RAV AntiVirus may not be able to detect all new viruses and variants. Please be aware that there is a risk involved whenever opening e-mail attachments to your computer and that MobiFon is not responsible for any damages caused by viruses.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat
2002-10-20 22:52 [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat Ciprian Niculescu
2002-10-21 13:16 ` Stef Coene
2002-10-21 20:59 ` Ciprian Niculescu
@ 2002-10-22 5:59 ` Stef Coene
2002-10-22 10:02 ` Ciprian Niculescu
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2002-10-22 5:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Monday 21 October 2002 22:59, Ciprian Niculescu wrote:
> Stef Coene wrote:
> > On Monday 21 October 2002 00:52, Ciprian Niculescu wrote:
> >>i compile the $subj, and found the htb qdisc in it, what version is it??
> >
> > I don't use redhat, but I'm sure there is a sch_sfq.s file in the kernel
> > tree where you can find the version information (HTB_VER). If you load
> > the module or compile htb in the kernel and use it, there is also a
> > report in dmesg about the htb version.
>
> * $Id: sch_htb.c,v 1.13 2002/05/25 09:04:50 devik Exp $
>
> #define HTB_VER 0x30006 /* major must be matched with number suplied by
> TC as version */
That's version 3.6, the latest version.
> no mesage in dmesg
>
> >>the tc from redhat knows about htb???
> >
> > Don't know, but if they have support in the kernel for htb, tc will have
> > it too.
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root htb default 6
> Unknown qdisc "htb", hence option "default" is unparsable
>
> and it's compiled in kernel, not module
You miss support for htb in the tc command. There is a binary on the homepage
of htb, or you can download the iproute2 src + the patch from the homepage of
htb and create your own binary.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat
2002-10-20 22:52 [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat Ciprian Niculescu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2002-10-22 5:59 ` Stef Coene
@ 2002-10-22 10:02 ` Ciprian Niculescu
2002-10-22 14:39 ` Stef Coene
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ciprian Niculescu @ 2002-10-22 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Stef Coene wrote:
>>
>>>>the tc from redhat knows about htb???
>>>
>>>Don't know, but if they have support in the kernel for htb, tc will have
>>>it too.
>>
>>tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root htb default 6
>>Unknown qdisc "htb", hence option "default" is unparsable
>>
>>and it's compiled in kernel, not module
>
> You miss support for htb in the tc command. There is a binary on the homepage
> of htb, or you can download the iproute2 src + the patch from the homepage of
> htb and create your own binary.
yes, i know, i don't have intentions on using shapping on that router,
was just an observation that redhat put the htb in kernel, but, didn't
put an update to iproute2 allready patched. They did a half work :((
C
-------------------------------------------------------
Xnet scaneaza automat toate mesajele impotriva virusilor folosind RAV AntiVirus.
Xnet automatically scans all messages for viruses using RAV AntiVirus.
Nota: RAV AntiVirus poate sa nu detecteze toti virusii noi sau toate variantele lor. Va rugam sa luati in considerare ca exista un risc de fiecare data cand deschideti fisiere atasate si ca MobiFon nu este responsabila pentru nici un prejudiciu cauzat de virusi.
Disclaimer: RAV AntiVirus may not be able to detect all new viruses and variants. Please be aware that there is a risk involved whenever opening e-mail attachments to your computer and that MobiFon is not responsible for any damages caused by viruses.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat
2002-10-20 22:52 [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat Ciprian Niculescu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2002-10-22 10:02 ` Ciprian Niculescu
@ 2002-10-22 14:39 ` Stef Coene
2002-10-22 19:16 ` Kenneth Porter
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2002-10-22 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 12:02, Ciprian Niculescu wrote:
> Stef Coene wrote:
> >>>>the tc from redhat knows about htb???
> >>>
> >>>Don't know, but if they have support in the kernel for htb, tc will have
> >>>it too.
> >>
> >>tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root htb default 6
> >>Unknown qdisc "htb", hence option "default" is unparsable
> >>
> >>and it's compiled in kernel, not module
> >
> > You miss support for htb in the tc command. There is a binary on the
> > homepage of htb, or you can download the iproute2 src + the patch from
> > the homepage of htb and create your own binary.
>
> yes, i know, i don't have intentions on using shapping on that router,
> was just an observation that redhat put the htb in kernel, but, didn't
> put an update to iproute2 allready patched. They did a half work :((
Conclusion : don't use RedHat :)
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat
2002-10-20 22:52 [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat Ciprian Niculescu
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2002-10-22 14:39 ` Stef Coene
@ 2002-10-22 19:16 ` Kenneth Porter
2002-11-24 22:19 ` Kenneth Porter
2003-01-16 21:23 ` Kenneth Porter
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kenneth Porter @ 2002-10-22 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
--On Tuesday, October 22, 2002 01:02:41 PM +0300 Ciprian Niculescu
<ciprian@promo.ro> wrote:
> yes, i know, i don't have intentions on using shapping on that router,
> was just an observation that redhat put the htb in kernel, but, didn't
> put an update to iproute2 allready patched. They did a half work :((
Did you enter a Bugzilla against the iproute package for this? Once it's in
the system, RH should get a patch into the Rawhide branch.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat
2002-10-20 22:52 [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat Ciprian Niculescu
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2002-10-22 19:16 ` Kenneth Porter
@ 2002-11-24 22:19 ` Kenneth Porter
2003-01-16 21:23 ` Kenneth Porter
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kenneth Porter @ 2002-11-24 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
--On Tuesday, October 22, 2002 01:02:41 PM +0300 Ciprian Niculescu
<ciprian@promo.ro> wrote:
> yes, i know, i don't have intentions on using shapping on that router,
> was just an observation that redhat put the htb in kernel, but, didn't
> put an update to iproute2 allready patched. They did a half work :((
Just to follow up on this, someone did open a bugzilla on this:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idu486
If you use Red Hat and want them to provide a HTB-enabled tc, register a
bugzilla account and add yourself to the cc list on this bug.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat
2002-10-20 22:52 [LARTC] kernel 2.4.18-17.7.x from redhat Ciprian Niculescu
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2002-11-24 22:19 ` Kenneth Porter
@ 2003-01-16 21:23 ` Kenneth Porter
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kenneth Porter @ 2003-01-16 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
--On Sunday, November 24, 2002 2:19 PM -0800 Kenneth Porter
<shiva@sewingwitch.com> wrote:
> Just to follow up on this, someone did open a bugzilla on this:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idu486
>
> If you use Red Hat and want them to provide a HTB-enabled tc, register a
> bugzilla account and add yourself to the cc list on this bug.
Updated today:
--- Additional Comments From pknirsch@redhat.com 2003-01-16 06:14
Will be included in iproute-2.4.7-7, available shortly via rawhide.
Read ya, Phil
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread